C9.Constantine Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) Imagine GRIN would create a map pack? Would you be willing to pay for it? Please reply w/ either: 1. Yes 2. Depends on the amout of maps (state the amount of maps) 3. No, but I would love a GRAW2 map pack 4. No, don't need map pack Thanks. -- 1. I would pay for a map pack/expansion pack. Edited October 1, 2007 by C9.Constantine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=WO=TekHousE Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 NO. I figure they owe me for GRAW 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PONDLIFE Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) Having just completed the single player campaign and really enjoyed it and would definitely buy an expansion pack. Multiplayer only would be a no. Edited October 1, 2007 by PONDLIFE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysticaly Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 There is no way I would ever pay for a map pack, to be honest I can't even see why it should be a question. GRIN should develop a map pack for free, simply because that is the tradition... Gearbox that have released titles for UBI have done it, so why can't GRIN ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMUK Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 1. Yes Say around 7 or 10 $ for map packs of 5 to 7 maps around 12 $ to 15$ for map packs of 10 + maps PROVIDED a lot of information is available about the maps AND their difficulty levels known before purchasing NOTE also : my experience to date with most mod maps ( coop ones) has been mixed. Most are too hard for casual gamers. That is, they do not scale well for different type of players (for casual to advanced players). If you want Graw + Graw 2 games to survive and thrive, you need casual gamers as well on board. Having only hardcore gamers on board is not enough. I asked questions on this forum about the best mod maps for casual players ( [GR] coop maps) and I am getting hardly any answers. Me and my friends are casual gamers (the 8 of us all have limited time ( jobs + family) but are willing to pay for retail games and add-ons if they are good. If we cannot enjoy playing once in a while maps that are accessible as well to casual gamers, then we will soon be lost to this community and will put our dollars elsewhere. It is THE critical challenge: have new maps that are well done and scalable, that is, playable by both casual gamers as well as hardcore gamers. And yes, then, we will gladly send the money to modders or GRIN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th33f. Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 1. Yes, but 2. Depends on the amout of maps (state the amount of maps, and if they are CoOp) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cell Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 2. 14 maps for MP. Brings us to 20 official for MP, should have had around there to begin with. If something like that came out, I would buy it no problem. Must include the auto downloader fix as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*WAR*Catscan Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 3) Nope. This game should have released with all maps available in MP. Also, considering the current activity levels in MPer I see no reason to spend any more cash on this game. I really like the game too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=EP_Geez Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I would pay for an expansion pack if they put in the same cover system as rainbow 6 Vegas PC . I would pay anything from £20 - £40 pounds for it if they did that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyn093 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 First a patch to fix all known problems + Free DL mappack with ALL maps from GRAW1 and GRAW2 . If this is a succes , i will pay for an expantion pack. Its up to GRIN/UBI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cangaroo.TNT Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Well, a TPV cover system vis a vis R6V would be a deal killer for me as far as a tac-sim is concerned (R6V is a fun game in it's own right, but far from a tac-sim). But, I don't know why Grin couldn't implement a cover system similar to R6V that leaves you in the first person view: >Put your back to a wall, you're looking away. >Swing out from cover, your perspective swings around, staying in FPV. I even think the animations are already there to do this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASGripen Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Paying for map packs is basically what I did twice with GR, and I had no problem with that: yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=LB=Specter Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I would pay for a map pack. because I honestly believe a well designed abundant map pack would grow this community. It would make this game desireable to the ppl that didnt want it. But i have seen in the past comments. The mexico thing is kinda overdone. lets go somewhere else please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJUK Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 yep 10 plus maps kit choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutlink Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Unless they were coop maps that addressed a lot of coop issues, then no, and I wouldn't be willing to spend more than $10 at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[RS]Stalker Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 If the game was wildly popular and there were lots of full servers, I would pay for an expansion. With the current state of the MP community, I would have to say no to more $$$. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttercupp Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 2. Depends on the amount of maps (10 for coop and adversarial modes). Fix the minor bugs left, and add auto map download (preferably without restarting the game). And yes, this game does need more players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggbutt Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Yep, I'd pay. If you guys remember, IT and DS were basically map packs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cell Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) Yep, I'd pay. If you guys remember, IT and DS were basically map packs. Yeah, basically, with a whole new campaign for each expansion, and a few, not many weapon additions, and if I remember correctly a few new MP gametypes. This really made everyone happy. the Sp & Mp'rs. Edited October 1, 2007 by Cell*AFZ* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricJ Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Yep, I'd pay. If you guys remember, IT and DS were basically map packs. Yeah, basically, with a whole new campaign for each expansion, and a few, not many weapon additions, and if I remember correctly a few new MP gametypes. This really made everyone happy. the Sp & Mp'rs. And that's something that really bugged me and why I didn't care much about the GRAW mappacks. Given the cheaters, and other crap that's on the servers that DO have players, it's getting pretty boring replaying the missions over and over and over. It's like the concept of supporting the community's desire just isn't there anymore and ultimately it's the community that pays their salary by buying their game. And that support gets the game noticed and god forbid popular rather than people who grumble constantly about what? Lack of dev support for their baby, which to be rude I guess, is like conceiving, birthing, and throwing it in an orphanage and moving on. A product is a responsibility, and if RSE is taking over, then thank god, as we got mondo support from GR1 and the ability to keep a game rolling for about 6-7 years? And that's what nobody realizes. Sure the SP side of the spectrum is a tad smaller, but usually sometimes you'd like to be a player in a fictional story, rather than just running around machoing about, and cheating because you don't want to take the time to hone those skillz.... Mp'rs get more focus due to the internet and because the AI in some cases, just blew anyways (both enemy and friendly), so it was hip to be hunting your virtual buddies (nee targets) and having a good ol' time, which is why it saddened me with BF2142, which overall could have a real cool SP element, but alas, you gotta go to EA and such and do the virtual killing online. Which kinda sucks when you're deploying somewhere and well, can't just hop online and take care of what you gotta do (and what you gotta do is more important than gaming anyways). And what blows it's not GRIN, Ubisoft asking these questions, it's another community member. Don't get me wrong, it's good that we're in some way trying to look out for each other, but man, you'd think that if you spent so much time on something, i.e. your investment, you'd at least appear to care about public opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[30+]Retlaw Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 How many new maps have been release for the 360 version? , how much the 360 players pay for them? How many maps came with the 360 version?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubletap Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I would not expect it to be free if we're talking about genuine co-op missions, and I would certainly consider paying for that, depending on quantity. But no I would not pay for additional mp paintball maps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARDelta Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Paying for map packs is basically what I did twice with GR, and I had no problem with that: yes. Agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.