WhiteKnight77 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Gamespot reports that the French government may defend Ubisoft in EA share grab. Ubi is looking to buy the Guillemot families shares to have even more of the shares and help stave off a possible buyout (my words). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yttocs1966 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 ? 4 U's. did EA BUY and then tell? or were they BUYING and someone picked up on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sup Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 New news! Vivendi might help UBISOFT! http://www.gamespy.com/articles/577/577471p1.html?fromint=1 Plus, Infogrames is in the mix now too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurFACE Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 I found more support towards vivendi. http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art.../501060313/1001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannik Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Vivendi and Ubisoft deny talks. Infogrames is the only big name that is publically stating support for Ubisoft v. EA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sup Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 The article I posted had that they denied 'em too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zantar45 Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Somewhat on/off topic See the newest poll on the Gamespot front page? (bottom right of page) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannik Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Hah! Great poll. Thanks, Zantar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYR_32 Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 I voted for the Queen of England..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Ranger Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Gamespot omitted a choice... I'd suggest Google. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 BAH, there's no RSE option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babydave Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Maybe one day someone will come along and buy RSE, and return it to its former glory from our point of view, from a RSE employee's point of view im sure theyre loving it, they mustve got big pay rises and bonus's since they joined ubisoft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidLockerGnome Posted January 8, 2005 Share Posted January 8, 2005 hey babydave, ive got 20 bucks, what u got to chip in to buy em? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Slink Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 So the news page is right? Vivendi are not interested? Thought it should have been now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR6 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Latest news: EA might get swallowed by an even bigger fish http://firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=7582 EA an acquisition target? GI.biz reports how Rupert Murdoch is coming up from down under to 'kick the tires' of some gaming companies. Speaking at a US investment conference, Peter Chernin admitted that News Corp was "kicking the tires of pretty much all video games companies" - up to and including market leader Electronic Arts. "We see [games] as a big business and would like to get into it," Chernin told the conference, according to a report in today's Financial Times. "We are struggling with the gap between companies like Electronic Arts, which come with a high price tag, and the next tier of companies," he explained. "These may be too focused on one or two product lines." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR6 Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Here's even more: EA says they did talk to Ubisoft, says not hostile http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompa...14399943_newsml Ubisoft has defense plan against potential EA bid - Guillemot http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/050114/323/faamw.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Here's even more: EA says they did talk to Ubisoft, says not hostile http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompa...14399943_newsml ← LOL, too funny, in that piece EA say "Everyone thinks that we never had talks with Ubisoft.", well that's because the Board of Directors at Ubisoft said "in the absence of information from the company Electronic Arts regarding its intentions". It's like a school yard debate, not like market leaders in the biggest entertainment sector negotiating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babydave Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 hey babydave, ive got 20 bucks, what u got to chip in to buy em? Ill add 20 quid to ur offer, do you reckon ubi would accept a bid of 35 pounds in a mix of ££ and $$ for their company we could run it better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoak Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 It's like a school yard debate, not like market leaders in the biggest entertainment sector negotiating. Well I don't think EA acquits themselves that badly in the PR department, but Ubi just about everything that comes out of Ubi PR & Marketing sounds like a raging twit-fest fighting for tryout for parts as Monty Python extras.. It would be funny if so much money wasn't spent on that stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zantar45 Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 More about EA then Ubi but still, you can't ignore stuff like this. http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/01/17/news_6116473.html Electronic Arts, ESPN hook up in exclusive 15-year deal ESPN brand and programming to surface in EA sports titles on all platforms; deal is second blow to Sega Sports and Visual Concepts. Electronic Arts broke the calm of a national holiday today by announcing a licensing deal of epic proportions. For the next fifteen years, EA will be the sole licensee of the ESPN brand in the area of sports games, which will include console, handheld, PC, and wireless games. Games with leverage the ESPN brand will make their way to retail sometime during calendar year 2006, "upon the conclusion of ESPN’s existing video game licensing commitments." The news is the second blow to current license-holder Sega (and its Visual Concepts development studio). It recently lost the right to publish sports games using the NFL license when EA scooped that license up. Now, it loses the right to the ESPN brand as well. In a statement released just minutes ago, the world's largest game publisher said, "The relationship will include established EA SPORTS franchises--which will be enhanced by ESPN telecast, print and online content--as well as new sports games to be published by EA based on ESPN media properties." The agreement is for fifteen years "with an option to terminate after ten years under certain conditions," the statement said. The agreement gives the publisher "exclusive first rights" to all ESPN content for simulation sports games. By Curt Feldman -- GameSpot POSTED: 01/17/05 12:05 PM PST Not to mention they already bought the licenses to the AFL about a week ago. From the outside, it looks even more like there are reprecussions to anyone trying to "challenge" EA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYR_32 Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 Geeez. They sure do like to put their competiton out of business, or greatly hamper their ability to create a similar product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sup Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 It looks like EA's goal isn't ".... getting great games out there..." so much as it is "Getting great games by other devs out of there" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suli Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 "Geeez. They sure do like to put their competiton out of business, or greatly hamper their ability to create a similar product." uh i know of few companies out side the "friendly competitor" range that dont use that as there guiding light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoak Posted January 18, 2005 Author Share Posted January 18, 2005 (edited) It looks like EA's goal isn't ".... getting great games out there..." so much as it is "Getting great games by other devs out of there" ← Heck, not just EA it looks like Ubi too -- and to me it looks more like the goal isn't "....getting great games out there..." so much as it is "Getting all games out there..."... You know quantity vs quality "If we own all the franchise or titles for a game theme it won't matter if they stink..." Ubi virtually announced this intention with their press release that stated their goal to become the single source of all tactical realism gaming around the time they bought the rights to do the Console version(s) of America's Army... Suli, that's a mighty fine signature you have there, and awfully intriguing! Reminds me of a similar Linux byline "Dream of better tools..." Would you care to elaborate on any background regarding what your sig implies? Edited January 18, 2005 by Hoak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRP 56 Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 Ubi virtually announced this intention with their press release that stated their goal to become the single source of all tactical realism gaming around the time they bought the rights to do the Console version(s) of America's Army... ← That's right. I'd forgot all about that statement. They should stick to that statement and turn PC GR2 into what it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts