Jump to content

GR:AW PC MIN SPECS


Recommended Posts

As posted by UBIRAZZ on the ubi forums

Computer: Pentium IV of 2Ghz or the equivalent (2.8Ghz recommended)

Memory: 512MB RAM (1024Mb recommended)

Operating System: Windows 2000/XP

DirectX: DirectX9.0c

Video Card: Shader 2.0 card with 128 MB of VRAM (256MB recommended)

Sound card: DirectX9 compatible sound card

Internet: Broadband / LAN connection

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc...13/m/4101009504

Please also see this post later in this thread, as the posted specs are not 100%.

Edited by Rocky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I exceed in everything but the video card.    <_<

Well I have the Athlon 64 3500+ which is 2.21 Ghz, but that shold be more than enough.....

Do you exceed the recommended specs or the minimum specs?

Well this is what I’ll be playing on.

Xeon 3.2

1.5GB Ram

And the best part….ATI FireGL V3100 :blink: ......... :rofl:

Yeah…I see a gpu upgrade as I’m not sure this card will play it at all....just enough to get by anyway.

Edited by BIGOLBRAIN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As posted by UBIRAZZ on the ubi forums

Computer: Pentium IV of 2Ghz or the equivalent (2.8Ghz recommended)

Memory: 512MB RAM (1024Mb recommended)

Operating System: Windows 2000/XP

DirectX: DirectX9.0c

Video Card: Shader 2.0 card with 128 MB of VRAM (256MB recommended)

Sound card: DirectX9 compatible sound card

Internet: Broadband / LAN connection

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc...13/m/4101009504

dang it i met everything except the min proc speed. I only have the amd 1.67 ghz processor. :( hope i can dumb down the graphics to still get decent fps. i need a demo to come out to try it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Athlon 2.2 gig - ATI9800PRO 128MB - 762 MB ram - Audigy 2 - 333mhz MOBO BUS speed.

... hmmm, shouldnt run completely crap but I guess it will be a case of easy on the shading & maybe no shadows & no AA. May have to drop to 1024x768 than current 1280x1024 .... will be interesting to see what I willl have to scaled down to from my setup ... the demo will be the tester.

If its that bad FPS / scaling down so it looks crap I will probably not purchase. If its not too bad on balance visualy and plays crap no purchase ... if its a ok balance between the 2 I will not purchase - but - wait for feedback of others of full game, if it looks good enough scaled and plays like a GR dream then im in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure those cards are based on the Radeon 9700 chips or a derivative of it. Your going to see a problem with the low # of pixel/vertex shaders units unfortunately.

Those are good for raw geometry (CAD), but bad for pretty rendering (games). ;)

-John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure those cards are based on the Radeon 9700 chips or a derivative of it. Your going to see a problem with the low # of pixel/vertex shaders units unfortunately.

Those are good for raw geometry (CAD), but bad for pretty rendering (games). ;)

-John

Yeah that's what I'm using it for...CAD.

I remember when the 9700 pro was a hell of a card...lasted forever. Those were the days I tell ya.

Anyway, I'll give it a shot when or if a demo comes out. That will give me a better idea I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...