JASGripen Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Do GRAW handle true dual core or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logos Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASGripen Posted May 3, 2006 Author Share Posted May 3, 2006 Thanks, a really good answer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoudazo Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Thanks, a really good answer! ← Are they supposed to release a dual-core patch? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossiski Posted May 4, 2006 Share Posted May 4, 2006 Thanks, a really good answer! ← Are they supposed to release a dual-core patch? ← I asked this same question not too long ago. http://www.ghostrecon.net/forums/index.php...16&hl=dual+core The answer still eludes us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaMerc Posted May 4, 2006 Share Posted May 4, 2006 Thanks, a really good answer! ← Are they supposed to release a dual-core patch? ← I asked this same question not too long ago. http://www.ghostrecon.net/forums/index.php...16&hl=dual+core The answer still eludes us. ← as far as I can tell, it doesn't use my Dual cores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordred Posted May 4, 2006 Share Posted May 4, 2006 Nope it doesnt use your dual cores, but as quake (i believe) has a dual patch they might release one for graw too. Although im not certain if a ptch can fully make it dual core...........don't they have to script that in from the bottom ? I hope they release a patch as im runnig X2 too here. -M- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASGripen Posted May 4, 2006 Author Share Posted May 4, 2006 Well now I have bought a +3800 AMD single core so the question is settled for me now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoudazo Posted May 4, 2006 Share Posted May 4, 2006 Well now I have bought a +3800 AMD single core so the question is settled for me now. ← Why would you do that? Games are going to be programmed for dual core, quad-core, etc. in the very near future, and your single core is going to be behind quite a bit when you could have spent a few more dollars (like $10 maybe?) and gotten a dual core. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASGripen Posted May 5, 2006 Author Share Posted May 5, 2006 (edited) Well now I have bought a +3800 AMD single core so the question is settled for me now. ← Why would you do that? Games are going to be programmed for dual core, quad-core, etc. in the very near future, and your single core is going to be behind quite a bit when you could have spent a few more dollars (like $10 maybe?) and gotten a dual core. ← I would comapre speedwise and then a Dual-Core "Manchester" 90nm 4600+ 2.4GHz is more at the same speed as a Venice 90nm 3800+ 2.4GHz. The difference in price between them is more like 350$. I could of course compare with slower Dual Core processors to get less difference in price between dual and single core, but I don't see the point with that. At same nominal speed the DC are faster of course (if DC is supported), but there is a lot of money you put in for that little extra. Edited May 5, 2006 by JASGripen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.