Jump to content

Learning HTML


Kamakazi

Recommended Posts

Don't do what I did and learn html through dreamweaver. It has a lovely habit of adding in its own code as and when it likes. Try using notepad and seeing if you can get it too look right (and across browsers). I had to unlearn my "html" skills (i.e. just adding tables and then dragging em wysiwyg style in DW) and start again as it never worked in bloody netscape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't do what I did and learn html through dreamweaver. It has a lovely habit of adding in its own code as and when it likes. Try using notepad and seeing if you can get it too look right (and across browsers). I had to unlearn my "html" skills (i.e. just adding tables and then dragging em wysiwyg style in DW) and start again as it never worked in bloody netscape.

Yeah, im aware of the limitations of dreamweaver. Guy i know is first setting its thing up in DW, then opens code in notepad and rewrites it al over again. <_<

Prob is, i dont wanna be a pro hardcore webdesigner. Just wanna finish my own site and than no html for me anymore.

Any recomms on other easy-programs?

Thanks, BlueRose_76

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. Guy i know is first setting its thing up in DW, then opens code in notepad and rewrites it al over again.

:blink:

That's like using a calculator to work out your tax return then doing it all again with an abacas :blink:

Dreamweaver does a very good job - it's the best WYSIWYG editor out there, used by industry professionals, and slated by html purists stuck in the stone age. Or at least it used to be, those notepad heroes have gone quite quiet recently IMO.

That's my take on it :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. Guy i know is first setting its thing up in DW, then opens code in notepad and rewrites it al over again.

:blink:

That's like using a calculator to work out your tax return then doing it all again with an abacas :blink:

Dreamweaver does a very good job - it's the best WYSIWYG editor out there, used by industry professionals, and slated by html purists stuck in the stone age. Or at least it used to be, those notepad heroes have gone quite quite recently IMO.

That's my take on it :D

Yes dw does a passable job at doing html, but it is far better to learn html the proper way initally (if you want to do it properly, but br doesn't seem to mind, so fair play.)

magnumKP stuck in the stone age since 2001 ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have about 90Mb of training videos off a magazine cover disk  I might be persuaded to upload.

How can i persuade you to upload them there vids :huh:

Just tell me you will watch them :D

I'll watch, I'll watch!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are very basic guides, but if thats what you need I will upload them, I'll FTP them up tonight and by the morning I'll post the URLs.

Thanks Rocky!! :) Are they gonna be up temporarily or permanently? I'm getting Broadband on thursday so i'll d/led them then if they are still up :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to cut out all the bloated junk that HTML editors add in.

Like what?

All the extemporaneous code that they add in. I don't know the names for them, but I usually edit out about 10-15% of code if I have used frontpage or some other editor and wind up with the exact same look and capability in HTML work I do. It's just unecessary info that these programs stick in that human coders don't need to utilize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the extemporaneous code that they add in. I don't know the names for them, but I usually edit out about 10-15% of code if I have used frontpage or some other editor and wind up with the exact same look and capability in HTML work I do. It's just unecessary info that these programs stick in that human coders don't need to utilize.

On the whole Frontpage is not very good, (from my reading in webmaster lounges, not personal experience)and from what I have read I can well believe it adds extra code.

Dreamweaver does not, on the whole, add unnecessary code. Infact the opposite is more likely to be true - it is more likely to add necessary code that most people would not think to add. Cross browser compatibility is one example, meta tag data is another.

In all the 400 odd pages I have produced at GR.net, I can safely say that DW hasn't added anything I didn't want it too. It used to when I used font tags, that was a bit messy in older versions of DW, but now I am using CSS in MX, no problemo. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...