Rocky Posted December 14, 2024 Share Posted December 14, 2024 Compared to the gaming landscape when Wildlands was released, the current financial landscape is a mess. Back then, in comparison, money was aplenty for game development and marketing. You only have to look at the lavish expense Ubisoft went to promoting their games at E3 compared to more recent years. Now there's a risk of a Ubisoft financial buyout looming its ugly head again and risking the future of Ubisoft, and by association, also the future of Ghost Recon. I've quickly summarised my concerns in this article about the risk of a Tencent takeover here. Worrying times for Ghost Recon fans! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101459 Posted June 21, 2025 Share Posted June 21, 2025 (edited) Glad to see things on GRN back up and the forums cleaned of all the weird spam! But who could ever have seen this coming?! Seriously, if you think about it, the only iterations of the Ghost Recon franchise that were any good happened when a Developer Studio were allowed more control over the development and the marketing reflected that -- rather than Ubisoft's top down design churn with all the prevarication about what they were offering. Whatever happens in a buyout can't be any worse than the track Ubisoft has been on for over a decade -- and could be a lot better,Ghost Recon had great IP that still has an enormous appeal but a now scattered following, that if taken to the task of delivering what was once offered in titles like OGR, GRAW, Future Soldier, and Wildlands could be an epic win for the franchise. A closer look at the current arrangement with Tencent shows how intransigent and dysfunctional Ubisoft management is, and how clearly they're circling the drain. Any resolution and clarity about the future of the IP would be better than where things are now... Edited June 21, 2025 by 101459 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobblers Posted July 31, 2025 Share Posted July 31, 2025 It seems like we've been talking about UBI's mismanagement for quite sometime, so this shouldn't come as a surprise. Maybe a takeover would be good for GR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted July 31, 2025 Author Share Posted July 31, 2025 So much bad news about Ubi recently, with employee court cases, financial mis-management etc etc. It's hard to believe they could fall from such great heights as they have some incredible IPs that gamers flock to every new instalment. I get the games industry is tough, but they had a very strong position and a huge market of loyal fans. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101459 Posted November 17, 2025 Share Posted November 17, 2025 (edited) On 31/07/2025 at 06:30, Rocky said: So much bad news about Ubi recently, with employee court cases, financial mis-management etc etc. It's hard to believe they could fall from such great heights as they have some incredible IPs that gamers flock to every new instalment. I get the games industry is tough, but they had a very strong position and a huge market of loyal fans. And the news just goes from bad to worse -- it does look like the Ubisoft is truly circling the drain... Loyal Fans, a gigantic market, amazing IP, and enormously talented Studios burned to the ground for over a decade... This last point -- what Ubisoft did to its Studios especially demonstrates just how completely the Publisher burned its bridges. A Publisher that micro-manages Studio development where previously enormously successful and popular IP was made without that oversight and micro-management, and it gets so bad key and even lead talent that built those Studios and their IP leave, after repeated demonstrations of poorer and poorer sales, bad reviews etc. -- is no different than if a Print Press Publisher were to micro-manage what an Author writes... Can anyone imagine if Penguin, Random House, or Sphere were to have told Tom Clancy, "The story line is okay, but we want all the main characters to be trans circus clowns and drag queens...and we don't want any realistic depictions of conflict, we want cartoon depictions that are humorous, and we'll have our Ghostwriter do it for you..."? And they did this after Tom Clancy and written his third best seller... Would that work? This is not to suggest there isn't a valid market for whatever it is a Publisher might want, or in the case of Ubisoft prefer and to develop alternative IP that targets that market or idea -- but to to so completely subvert and obviate Studios and talent that have demonstrated they understand their genre, market and audience as well as Red Storm and Massive Entertainment did (and studios like Grin and Crytek that worked so hard and were just getting there) -- is beyond appalling... That Ubisoft did this, relentlessly, across its entire Studios portfolio & IP stack, in the face of decades of enormous Fan & Review criticism, tanking sales, -- shouldn't make any of the current outcomes a shock or surprise to anyone. Hopefully, the IP will be acquired by a party or parties that understand the enormous squandered potential, and/or will put someone in charge that does as there remains an enormous hole in the Tactical Realism and Stealth gaming market that hasn't been filled filled with competent 'AAA' titles for over a decade... Edited November 17, 2025 by 101459 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.