RAbbi_74 Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Wow. Love how these threads keep on topic for so long. This one's done alright so far. The question is, does this other company set a better example? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwgfghost Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 I'm sure we won't get the answer to that until few weeks after the game's released. I'm not buying another GR game based off of what I thought of the demo. GRAW was alright in my opinion but I don't think GRIN learned anything. Sure they put in the recon mode but eh. Didn't really do much IMO. I don't think anybody could learn much from Infinity Ward for this series. The whole reason I kinda liked Call of Duty and Call of Duty two were all the historical things. COD4 just seems like an attempt to compete with BF which I'm sure it's better but it's not a tactical shooter. And I'm more of a COOP person so my main gripes are from that. Never really got into player vs player modes with this game. Only thing I could think of is an anti-cheat and also make it harder to use the M99. 203's supposed to annihilate people so deal with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa6 Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 What I think needs to be done is, stop with this "tactical shooter of the year crapola." Everyone says they made the tactical shooter of the year. separate FPS from tactical first person shooters. FPS would include COD4's, crysis,farcry and other shooters. tactical shooters would include GR1, Ground branch...and so on. That's a great start for Grin. GRAW,GRAW2 are simple FPS's. intelligent design wins hearts and minds in game design. the hearts and minds of the gamers who buy the games. I guess as the old saying goes, "You forfeit the confidence of the people once and you'll never get it back." Bugs and map errors unchecked ruin a companies rep REAL fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrNo~SPARTA~ Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Whats going to really make a difference is which one comes out with a map editor first. The first one to do that will almost put a nail in the others coffin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCO*AFZ* Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 What I think needs to be done is, stop with this "tactical shooter of the year crapola." Everyone says they made the tactical shooter of the year. separate FPS from tactical first person shooters. FPS would include COD4's, crysis,farcry and other shooters. tactical shooters would include GR1, Ground branch...and so on. That's a great start for Grin. GRAW,GRAW2 are simple FPS's. intelligent design wins hearts and minds in game design. the hearts and minds of the gamers who buy the games. I guess as the old saying goes, "You forfeit the confidence of the people once and you'll never get it back." Bugs and map errors unchecked ruin a companies rep REAL fast Tactical shooters can't include ground branch as it's not released lol! That would be like saying COD5 is a tactical shooter. (you don't know until you see it live) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAbbi_74 Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 I read on the Crysis forum someone calling THAT the best tactical shooter out there. Yeah, a game with boss battles set in the future where man battles alien. It's got tactical written all over it. But that's the problem- expectations are changing. Thanks, Ubishaft, for ruining that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.