Jump to content

Mission Stats


Alderei

Recommended Posts

One more interesting tidbit...

As I work on improving my "recon" skills in this arcade shooter, I attempt to tackle missions with as many intels acquired and scanned out of combat as possible. I also seek to always engage combat rather than react to it.

Just for kicks, I wanted to beat the first quick mission in such a manner as to acquire every "quick mission achievement" at one go. Now, I already had acquired some of them on previous attempts, so I just figured I would meet the necessary criteria and call it good.

After a little practice, I did it today. No hits against (me or team), 100% accuracy, all intels acquired out of combat, all battles engaged by me, Teammates have 50% or more kills...I think that's all of them. My score was 13,000 something and I was rated a Ghost.

Here's the question: If you complete a mission in this fashion, should it not render the highest score possible? One would think that the Dev's would reward someone who can do it with a great score. And mine wasn't bad on the leaderboards. But it wasn't tops or even tied for tops. In fact the top score was rated "lone-wolf" and in the 15,000. They fired 500 rounds and hit roughly 25% accuracy...

The difference between us was time...11 minutes vs. 20 minutes.

But I'm confused, isn't this a Ghost Recon Game? The Dev's don't reward being a Ghost or being recon oriented...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...