FWF.Unleashed2k Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 I have the 360 version and been hearing great things about the pc version, what is the difference as in single and multiplayer? Does the singleplayer have a different campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cangaroo.TNT Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Same story. Everything else is different. Download the SP demo to see for yourself. It's very slow paced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demanufakture Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 (edited) Same story. Everything else is different. Download the SP demo to see for yourself. It's very slow paced. Slow paced as in, it's much more tactical. Edited August 15, 2007 by Demanufakture Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgt.hoot Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 xbox hippies need to wake up and buy REAL games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannik Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Sgt.hoot, stop it. Just stop. You've made your point. You're a hater. Move on. This isn't a request. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demanufakture Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Well I would have to say the Xbox 360 version looks good to. I just don't have an Xbox 360 yet. I have the original Xbox and I have Ghost Recon 2 and Ghost Recon 2: Summit Strike for it. They both kick ass and I imagine they play much like the Xbox 360 GRAW and GRAW2. I think I would enjoy GRAW and GRAW2 on the Xbox 360 as much as I do Ghost Recon 2 and Summit Strike on the original Xbox. However, I am 99% a pc gamer so I would have to say I like the pc GRAW and GRAW2 better than the console equals. Just my two cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteKnight77 Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 As stated, download the demo and try it for yourself. 'Nuff said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RnegadeVyp3r Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The game is built by two different Dev Teams with different hardware (obviously) and stuff... so dont expect much to be the same. Having watched some footage on youtube for the 360 version, it looks arcady and it well... not "tactical". Make sure you have a fair beast of a PC for this game tho, as even tho the 360 isnt that highly spec'd, the PC Version can truely look stunning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWF.Unleashed2k Posted August 16, 2007 Author Share Posted August 16, 2007 xbox hippies need to wake up and buy REAL games Too bad i'm not an xbox hippie... (I buy real games ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyFox Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 I've played both. The 360 version is not BAD. It looks very pretty, it operates pretty much as advertised, but it is faster paced and geared towards assault rather than sneakiness. Sometimes that's cool. BTW, 360 owners, Summit Strike is backwards compatible with the 360 and plays well. Set to the highest difficulty settings, the SP campaign WILL kick your tail - it can be frustrating as hell, but worth playing if you haven't. In contrast, the PC version is slower paced (depending on the map, there are several with just plain waves of enemies, after all - stealth that!) and requires much more on the part of the SP commander in utilizing tactics and available cover for bounding, fire lanes, etc. Or you can set them on Follow like many do... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.