Jump to content

Dangerous Waters


Chems

Recommended Posts

Computer Games magazine just had an article on this game comparing it to SHIII. Rated it a 3 1/2 star game and liked it but still gave the nod to SHIII which got an editors choice rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Computer Games magazine just had an article on this game comparing it to SHIII. Rated it a 3 1/2 star game and liked it but still gave the nod to SHIII which got an editors choice rating.

And yest another game that requires thinking to win multiple awards. Ubi, wake up and smell the coffee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Computer Games magazine just had an article on this game comparing it to SHIII. Rated it a 3 1/2 star game and liked it but still gave the nod to SHIII which got an editors choice rating.

And yest another game that requires thinking to win multiple awards. Ubi, wake up and smell the coffee.

... It was UBI that published it. I'd say they were well aware doing that was a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get my drift do you Sup. Ubi published another game that has won awards (do you see where I am going?) and it is a thinking game just as GR1 (which won multiple awards including Game of the Year from at least 2 game magazines). While SHIII is a niche game, so is GR IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get my drift do you Sup. Ubi published another game that has won awards (do you see where I am going?) and it is a thinking game just as GR1 (which won multiple awards including Game of the Year from at least 2 game magazines). While SHIII is a niche game, so is GR IMO.

And UBI saw the chance to take GR out of it's niche. It's not like they've abandoned PC gamers -- They still publish the IL2 games, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will they get the dumbed down treatment? History shows that they stand a chance. Do you honestly thing players of those games be happy? I know I wouldn't as I play them too. Why do I play them? They aren't games that interest the average gamer.

Ask yourself this, why did Ubi cancel GR2 for PC and why is GR Summit Strike (for XBox) being developed to return to the original style of gameplay (Ubi's words)? If people wanted action games, they wouldn't be canceling games or stepping back if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will they get the dumbed down treatment? History shows that they stand a chance. Do you honestly thing players of those games be happy? I know I wouldn't as I play them too. Why do I play them? They aren't games that interest the average gamer.

Ask yourself this, why did Ubi cancel GR2 for PC and why is GR Summit Strike (for XBox) being developed to return to the original style of gameplay (Ubi's words)? If people wanted action games, they wouldn't be canceling games or stepping back if you ask me.

Why is R6 4 looking to be just like R63 (xbox)? People love action games, and UBI thought that meant that GR would make a good action game. That was a mitake, so they're shifting it back. They still have plenty of examples of action games selling, though. And plenty of sims selling, actually... Ubi stays pretty balanced, if you pay attention.

(Splinter cell, for example, only got more realistic with CT, including a 'hard' difficulty with realistic health, save the medpacks.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...