Jump to content
Ghost Recon.net Forums

Recommended Posts

I have these benchmarks for pre-hardware installation. The first 2 are for Open GL benchmarks and one is even overclocked at a smaller resolution (first time I ever had used that test too). The second it clocked at 166x12 for a clock speed of 2.0gHz for my CPU (normal clock speed for a 2400+)

The 3rd is a MadOnion 3dMark 01 DX8 run.

800x600, 2600+

1024x768, 2400+

3dMark01

When I get the new hardware installed I will run new benchmarks to compare how it helped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have my new hardware installed and ran the benchmarks that I had in the first post along with 3dMark03 this time.

3dMark03

3dMark01

GLExcess

I also ran a short GR test on the Embassy map and reached a FPS of 350+ for now, but haven't made it to where I find the highest (this is how I compare how GR runs on my system).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice scores WK. If I lower my resolution in 3DMark 2001, I can get a score of 13,700+.

Edit - Clicky!

My settings are a lot lower, but I hang tough with a dated 4200. Although you smoke me in fill rates.

Edited by Crimson
Link to post
Share on other sites
Crimson, the link you posted is to my system. :o

It should be a comparison between both of our rigs... which are really close.

3DMark 2001 is bad at detecting hardware/software setups. I have WinXP and an Athlon XP, yet it says differently. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7549415

From Crimsons link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7549415

The links are the same from what I see along with the drop down list to MY previous tests are in both.

Please try again Crimson.

Both pages were opened in a seperate browser before copying the URL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is strange is that NurFACE's CPU marks are only 29 points ahead of my "slower" CPU. I am sure if I OC mine a bit it will match if not beat it.

Note that with the current BIOS I am using, I have to run my normal 133mHz FSB CPU at 166 though at a lower multiplier to get it to run at "stock" speeds. Either way it still is only a few points difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...