Jump to content
Ghost Recon.net Forums

AKARazor

Members
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AKARazor

  1. Yeah I guess, photoshop has a lot more ''potential'' and facilitys, such as all the effects you can use (yes I know psp also them, but not as many ). Only 'problem' is that I started off using paint shop pro before Photoshop, thus its harder to get used to. If I want something done quickly, I'll use PSP, cos I know about everything I'm doing. But my photoshop work is of a better quality (well, I think it is ) BTW - does anyone know if there are any plans for more Ghost Recon expansions? Sorry if this has been asked, I just think an arctic add-on would be great! Razor
  2. lol, sounds trendy Although i dont think they'd do too well in combat ..unless the enemy felt sorry for them The hardest skin to work out where everything is is Unreal Tournament 2003 - now THATS confusing! I havnt been skinning that long really, i first started out with the tribes 2 skins - made some real cool ones, but with realistic games such as Ghost Recon, youre kinda limited to what you can do, in order to keep it within the realism aspect. BTW - what do you guys prefer to use - Paintshop pro or Photoshop? Raz
  3. I put them on, the problem was i put them on the wrong skin - the ones that come with the game in the orgmiss folder, not the ones in my mod folder No matter, t'wa ages ago I havnt tried to skin for Gr in ages, last ones i did were ''Urban Camo'' - looked alright i guess...
  4. The first time i tried skinning for GR, i ended up with all my characters have a big golden logo on their backs By the way, I'm new to the Board - Hi everyone
×
×
  • Create New...