Snake@War

I vote for somewhere either in South America or visit a ex-USSR communist state.

The demo's pretty good, but it's a full strategy game.

Hey, thanks Wk.

Sik skilz!

Congratulations! That's awesome.

I would get Battlefront I, personally, unless you feel you NEED the space combat. Battlefront just "feels" like a better game, like I said earlier. Does that help?

Reorganizing in a mission isn't cheesy. It's neccesary for real military units to stay effective deep into a mission. It's called ACE in the Army. It stands for ammunition, casualty, equipment. It is a period in a mission were a team can consolidates and rearms. This includes, for SF, changing attatchments, I guess... Wow... Did I just post that? LOL

I voted for woodland forest but I would like to make it a combination between woodland and snow.

LOL! Check this one out!

I've got 4.76mb down speeds with 413kb up.

Awesome news. Ruin, what's cmo?

http://ces.engadget.com/ This writing tablet/monitor looks particularly interesting and useful... Tons of awesome stuff here. Enjoy!

This post is primarily about RTW. (OFF TOPIC) RTW is just plain awesome. I have played the demo and found it to be the best strategy game ever. Right now I'm saving my money for GRAW, other than that I would buy RTW. RTW=Next game on the list, after GRAW.

I might just get the game, now that I know they have a mod like that. I find the language offensive and unneccesary as well.

If you have Battlefront I keep that and don't buy II. Other than space combat, IMO, a lot of the game is not quite as good. That's just the way they integrated the new units and the Jedi. If you want the space combat, buy it. If you could care less about the space combat, save your money.

Too cool.

This is all how I feel! Great post Colin.

There are some undetermined things on there...

Me too! I could use a sucker! I'ld like to lick that smile right off it's face!

ROFL! That's hilarious!

http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/poledeer.asp It's true, but that's not the real conversation.

That's pretty good Rocky! I second en4cement, saying, "This may be the understatement of 2006..."

While off topic to the thread, I do think you should give the demo a go. It's built on the GR engine, with some huge upgrades, while still being playable on moderate systems. ← I have played the demo, and wasn't impressed, HOWEVER, if Lockdown is any indicator how GRAW will run, I have a Saphire Radeon 9600 256MB card, gig of RAM, and 3.0 HT P4, and I can play the game @1024*768 with everything at High detail except for shadows at low, and I get 40+ FPS. Shadows are my "card killer."

I KNOW! (I think...) "tcejorp ratava" or "elcycrotom". Rocky, those are both guesses. They have just been... encoded.

Hey guys, when I turn off shadows and turn down lighting I can play just about ANY new game out there at high quality. I have a Saphire Radeon 9600 with 256mb. Is that normal? I'm thinking the core's capabilitys are too outdated. The core speed is kinda up to date but the memory speed's behind by a whale of a lot.