CovertRecon

blueman - while i realize now that i was a wee bit heatedwhile writing my reply, i found that i was a little bit.. exagerating. What i meant to say was that all this discussion comes down to is one of them "my dad is stronger then yours", and then i chirped in my $0.02. Like wolfsong said, comparing sf units is just plain stupid. But if there was one unit that i do not want to meet in combat, it would be the IDF SF or the russian spets naz.

ack ack ack... what a silly, pointless little discution. "my dad is stronger then yours". well, the US special operations units 'ain't all that'. Most of them are acctually kinda crappy, mind you. What they lack in skills they gain in equipment and air-superiority, and due to them being full-time soldiers. Swedish SF have and are kicking US ###### on countless EX'es, and we are just a small country with not alot of gear and soldiers that are conscripts for (at longest) 15 months. You saw a show about how though seal training is? aw poor you, the swedish equialent, the costal rangers, endure tougher training then them, and they beat the seals over and over again. The worlds most skilled and proffessional army imho is the IDF, or the Israeli Defence Force. After them comes the brit sas/sbs, and after them comes the nordic rangers, specificly the swedish and norweigians.