2nd Ranger

You are damn skippy.

]

Holy crap, you people make me want to dig out my eyes with an ice pick. In fact, that isn't such a bad idea. OH JESUS GOD IT HURTS BUT IT IS SO TOTALLY WORTH IT New ArmA video and screenshots

That first guy totally looks like Kiefer Sutherland.

Not to be a killjoy, but perhaps the current theme isn't exactly getting the juices flowing, if you know what I mean.

I'd like to take this opportunity to say something to all those who didn't like Flashpoint, but think ArmA will be their saviour from the soul-crushing demise of their favourite game franchise blah blah blah. If you didn't like OFP, you won't like ArmA. For those who aren't sure why they didn't like OFP - Sometimes you just have to take a look inside, deep inside, and find the courage to admit that you really care about graphics more than you say you do on forums. Also, if you don't like large (and dare I say - realistic) game worlds, then you're harping for the wrong game.

These go back to about a week ago, but since our resident ArmA newshound isn't around, here they are for anyone who hasn't seen them. Older ones - I'll be damned if I'm linking them all. From that update: newer ones Also, it seems that Russian publisher Akella is planning to call their version [Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising]: Armed Assault. We'll see how that goes for them.

Do you think Jeremy Clarkson can hit a falling object at a hundred feet with a rocket launcher? Even if you do, do you think Top gear has enough money to pay for all the extra rockets he'd need before they finally got a take they could use? Do you think they have the patience and resources to drive X number of cars off a cliff until Clarkson gets lucky and hits it? The answer you are looking for is NO. Plus, I saw this episode when it was on TV, and the CGI is utterly noticable. Not everything you see on Tv is real.

Holy crap man, I just watched the Animation video. The part where the player runs and then hits the dirt is awesome.

Yes.

Yes, I was first linked to it via a comedy website/forum I visit. There was a long discussion there about 9/11 etc, and it eventually lead to the admin writing an article about the conspiracy theories, which was subsequently posted on the LC forum and, unsurprisingly, was met with a flurry of responses like "Man, this guy is obviously a government shill". I find it very amusing. However, it also makes me angry, so I guess I should stop reading it. _____ On an unrelated note, I wanted to say something that came to mind when I read Moose's question about wreckage and stuff at the pentagon

Yeah, fair enough. In my mind there is plenty of evidence to conclude that a 757 did hit the pentagon. However, unless I see a video of the plane hitting, I cannot say for sure, though I believe that was the case. On the subject of the "What We Saw" video - Calius, please tell me you aren't one of the people who gets all giddy as soon as you hear that woman say "IT WAS A MILITARY PLANE!" (If not, fine. But I will continue anyway to make my point in response to the people I have seen who cite that video as solid evidence) First off, we have all seen the footage of the planes hitting

Certainly the way people present their beliefs and theories is going to have some effect on how they are received by others. If you speak and act like you have no interest in what the other parties have to say, you are going to be dismissed pretty quickly. Avery and the other guy failed at this during that debate. I personally am willing to listen to what someone is saying, as long as it sounds rational and they show that they are at least considering the possibility that they are wrong. This is a trait I feel is lacking in most conspiracists. Taking 9/11 as the freshest example: if t

Well, they did alot better than Avery and the other guy at simply having a debate. Avery was sniggering at many of the things they said. When they said something he didn't like, he or the other guy personally attacked them - calling them shills or liars. That is why people do not generally consider conspiracy theorists to be rational human beings. As soon as the other party rebuts a point or provides evidence contrary to what they believe, they immediately brand their opponents liars or government pawns. The Loose Change forum is a classic example of this. One can disagree with what t

Man, if you think that was bad, you should read the thread about the debate on the Loose Change forum. I have never wanted to cave in so many faces with so many sharpened bricks in one day.

What is BAS_MH6? I have all the BAS stuff, including the little birds, but I don't seem to have that.

Wow. That is alot of addons. Fortunately I have almost all of them.

I think he is referring to the fact that 'DirectX10' appears in the search box in the link, and this video has apparently been flagged as a result of that search. The answer is probably because the video was uploaded by or at armedassault.com, which probably references DirectX.

Clearly, Russia will one day defeat us all.

The dead numbered around 20-23 people, according to most news outlets. "Eighteen people were killed. A further 946 were injured" "...23 people dead... 947 injured" Couldn't find anything solid from news media on the cameraman, but certainly everywhere the video is posted says he died.

Step 1: Download and install Audacity Step 2: Open Audacity and in the drop-down menu at the top, select 'Stereo Mix'. Step 3: Start recording, then play the video.

The default 3rd person key is the enter key on the numpad. Is that the one you are pressing? If so, try changing it. Also, download Izarc and use that for opening your rar files and such. When you have extracted the files, read the readme and put them where it tells you (usually in Codemasters/Operation Flashpoint/Res/Addons).

Bob Saget

No, of course not. Just what you read on American news media websites.

Uh... was mine disqualified or something?