whoa182

They definitly keeping quiet about the PC version, If they were to start advertising it everywhere... they could lose a lot of potential customers, also they know that PC GR gamers might go for the Xbox and then the PC version when they find out more about it. So lets get GR 2 X box out of the way and im sure within 2-3 weeks of release we will see PC version more often in the news on Websites, i hope lol. Up untill now ive been playing Joint Operations, to be honest i am getting so SICK of it. to the point i cant play it more than 5 minutes. People dont use tactics, majority run an

The Graphics are impressive... cant wait to play it in 05 on PC IM not sure whether i am going to buy and Xbox , cos i want to get GR 2 and Halo 2 . hmmmm

Lone wolf looks So cool i thought. Gives you all a look at New technologies that will be used soon. Shame they didnt include the Nanotech suits to blend in with the environnment ( predator style ) lol. I'll end up playing both modes.. Definitly.

no1 read that article?

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040930/nyfnsw01_1.html Most of you probably read that. Voice recognition and talking and commanding your A.I about in the game is definitly part of the future in gaming. Will it be implemented into the PC version? I think it would be a lot easier. And it would be fun. Eventually we'll be able to have conversations with the A.I inside the game Just need a Few more GB's of ram and bit more processor speed like 10ghz lol . FOr it to do it well and more accurate. "Fonix is making speech recognition programs for electronic games that allow players to c

I imagin it will be simular to using ed 3d glasses on the game " Joint Operatoins " loosk really cool

The OTS view is growing on me from, the latest VIDEOS i have seen, I think i might prefer it for Single player missions tho. hmmm

i think the cover is fine, i mean if you have bullets, grenades, bombs coming near you, id like to see how calm you are...

yeah :S lol

Well instead of stone into gold ( which i think i have a more clear understanding why that may not be possible, I dunno :S lol ) You could Turn coal into diamonds by re-arranging atoms But i think most of you get the point, If and When nano assemblers are created you could litrually see things made out of nothing, they use the raw materials, re-arrange atoms n stuf to build. Like a house just litrually building itself or a rocket engine building itself. "first products made from nanomachines will be stronger fibers. Eventually, we will be able to replicate anything, including d

Well most technologies are dangerous but while we build these complex systems we should have built safeguards in place to take care of them effectivly, i hope. Cos i dont fear Nuclear weapons in the future, its Biotech and nano that are the most dangerous and the tools are more easily to get hold of 21st century warfare.. >>Informtion<< is probably the biggest threat. if some1 has the knowledge to engineer viruses... well we got some problems if defenses are not put up. But im hoping they will be. But companies like Intel are researching and developing a microchip to

no offend, but it will never be possible to turn stone into gold (unless its uran and u sell it.... ) gold is an element, build out of elektrons neutrons and protons, rock is not a element its build out of different elements.... beside that speakin of nano technology atoms (or molekules) are arranged in a specific way, like the parts in a car.... the big difference between the macro world (thats where most of us live) and the nano world is the size, and some natural laws which are different... np rico. its better to be corrected rather than me thinking i know something that is w

yeah at first i see these sort of technologies in the hands of small teams, special ops etc... but the amazing thing about nanotechnology is, It lets you manipulate atoms. Meaning You can re-arrange them. For example. A rock is made up of atoms, we are made of atoms and fruit is made up of atoms, By simply re-arranging them we could turn stone into Gold, fruit into water etc... So If you extract the atoms from the enviornment And in theory a Nano assembler would arrange the atoms and out comes the item, litrually out of nothing. Thats the reason why it would be extremely chea

isnt DARPA researching some cool technologies such as using Nanotechnologies to make bullet proof clothing. the techniques using carbon nanotubes can create a bullet proof vests and it would as thin as paper and flexible as a t-shirt and would stiffen on impact and be 30-100x stronger than normal vests and VERY light compared to current armor. Also they will be placing many sensors and diagnostics into the uniform to monitor soldiers health and apply drugs automaticly when needed and monitor the enviornment too. They are also working on to make a soldier invisable and blend into the envi

common sense. which some people here lack

Dont get into the health system. I think AA done it perfectly, ghost recon 2 should be simular. I just hope you cant kill some person in GR 2 with a few shots to the foot

The two particularly grainy images are from a print magazine, and have been scanned by the website. Loot, did you know that the "low resolution (Xbox)" is capable of 1920x1080i. Yep, low resolution. what?

ED 3D glasses sort that out, SERIOUSLY !

I dont see the yellow blob on GR 1 as a trademark of GR, i hate the yellow blob. I bet if FPWV was put in GR 2, no matter what you say about unrealistic or realistic, it will be prefered and chosen by the majority. when you run around in GR you are constantly in ready mode, ready to fire no matter what stance or where u are looking etc., you always have only 1 view up. i just prefer to see the weapon i am carrying, is that to much for you to understand

They couldnt have very advanced graphics because of the number of people in 1 server. it would kill your PC, 1 time we had 250 people in 1 server. Ping was green but frame rate was about 3 ! Also I bought joint Operations and i play with a team of about 6 and we Fight on servers in co-ordination with another team in Team speak. It feels more tactical than GR ever did, ALthough GR was a different style of game.

that iron sight is really cool dannik. Done much better that many games ive seen THAT WOULD BE AWESOME WITH MY ED 3D GLASSES !

How often have you actually shot a gun? I've posted numerous times about this in the past but it looks like I have to again..... I shot semi pro in combat matches for many years. Never in running to cover to shoot did I ever see my rifle like in RvS or FarCry. The only time you see the rifle is when you have it shouldered to fire. And then if you're doing it correctly you only see the sights. When snap shooting (buttstock shouldered, muzzle down so as not to obstruct your view) you still don't see any of that B.S. that so many people are accustomed to in movies and vid games. Plea

again... and again Do you guys really need an explanation ? ok here it is. THE VIDEO IS FROM A CONSOLE!. even the original GR was crappy on the Xbox and PS2 ! . PC will be different, geez. you all worry too much.

GR 2 WoW they actually look like trees... its looking nice i think, thats Xbox too, i hope the PC version can show us a bit more ok so the patchy grass is back in GR2 and not the system we see in Joint Ops, but this might/should work better than the flat surface we seen in GR1. EDIT: oh actually... the grass here looks awesome and very realistic compared to other games... http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/tomclanc...ns.html?page=18 since thats in the PC section... its definitly PC - GR2 ? (cos gamespot sometimes put them in the wrong section)

I would prefer to see my weapon, i know we all been through this before but the ghosts are moving in " ready position " so the weapon should be in view. mabey not while running but you know what i mean.. It doesnt feel complete without seeing what gun im holding lol. UBI/Redstorm has everything to gain and nothing to lose to allow FPWV as an optional thing. If you have played Joint Operations its clear that they are not firing the weapon from the waste, its in a ready to fire position and then u bring up the scope when u wanna use it for more accuracy when firing. If you say NO t