whoa182
-
Content Count
407 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Calendar
Posts posted by whoa182
-
-
Good luck , the Cryengine ( sandbox editor ) is awesome
. how is the online community in far cry these days? They have military skins out ? -
whoa182 i agree JO can be more tactical than GR in places,and is my fav game at the mo, but when your on a server without your team mates i have found that i can run into a base just spraying without being hit because of the amount of newbies and rack up huge amounts of kills.(RAMBO
) You cant run and gun anymore in the gold version of JO , so rambo cant be done now. But i find the game boring when i play on my own, its better with a team , but i guess thats the same with most games. Also using the sniper gun is harder, you can get 1000m shots, but you have to maually adjust elevation according to range meaning u need a spotter. sniper scope also moves because of breathing
-
lol ok , but i dont know about a real gun cos i dont usually go around the streets aiming at people and try running, im not sure if id get a positive reaction from people...
But ok whatever, i dont really care, cos i like ghostrecon anyway. i just like to discuss why and get some answeres on your views and try to counter them lol.
bla
and by the way i got shot twice the last time i went. they were both arm shots. and no i wasnt camping i was commanding 4 ppl in my team and we won everygame
-
Depends on how you run with the weapon . ive been paintballing and i am usually quite good and i can usually see the gun. but i also didnt have a target at eye level while i was runnign i had to to raise the gun.
when im reloading i can see the gun , when im running i can sometimes see the gun depending on how fast im running and what position im in while running.
ironicly when i was reloading i didnt see a reticule infront of me hhhmmmm . yes i seen the gun
if someone cannot see the gun while looking forward then you should see a eye specialist for that sorry
-
The original rainbow 6 reticule is still my favourite, its unique and adds to the gameplay IMO. Its more realistic than having a gun stuck half way up the screen, i dont care if i cant see the gun,its not real and im not holding it so it doesnt bother me. However in rambo games such as Joint Ops and Counterstrike I appreciate it as it adds to the atmosphere.
And also options options options. We cant expect RSE to give us more than 1 or maybe 2 options,its a waste of their time as far as efficiency goes.
Joint operations , Rambo game , LMAO !!!!
Im in the beta testing and ive been in it since the begginging, the game has evolved and become so good, much more tactical than ghost recon ever was!. ive met good people so we put together a fireteam and its very stealthy and tactical. to bad about the medics but the graphics, the gameplay, the stealth , sounds are amazing!. not to mention being able to play in a server with 250 people and having a green ping !
you play joint ops how you want to play it !. my team consists of around 8 people, we stick together in the fireteam and we litrually take down anything we see with great co-ordination against people not working as a team, setting ambushes etc... wow ! guess wha joint operations has grass aswell for stealth not like what you see in ghost recon with 4 pieces of grass every 30m lol
how can you say a reticule is realistic! , its a BLOB on the screen, when you are running the see the gun in your hand, so you should see it when your in ghost recon, the reticule view can also be seen in Joint operations just as ghost recon has it !. but its just totally unrealistic not to have the gun in sight, how realistic is a reloading icon in the center of your screen ?
i had some real good times in ghost recon but never as good as what ive experienced in joint operations, i never thought that a game would be better at using tactics and co-ordination as ghost recon did it, but joint operations have proven me wrong, the Public demo is nothing like the tech beta by the way
Thoughout the beta in joint operations nova has decided to make the game more realistic and take out the old run n gun ability just like ghost recon. it reminds me of the ghost recon days all over again !
-
why would you want to see that 2D reticule ! , it puzzles me to this day !, its crap
-
AWESOME !!!!!!!!!! i was waiting for some1 to do this !! Thank you!
-
you all get worked up and worried so easily, from the 1st comments and information about the medic system and saying about they wanted to keep gr1's gameplay. The medic situation was obvious, you all thought that it would bring them back from the dead of something lmao .
finally that discussion can end ! , but there is probably some people still un-happy about the medic ?
-
ok lol. i know the majority seem to be against it i guess. I dont really care to be honest, but dont say its not realistic to have a medic, cos that just isnt correct
-
Certain aspects of the current game such as the ability to pick up enemy weapons or a medic that heals wounded team mates simply does not fit into the realism precedent set by the [Ghost Recon]
>> WRONG << you know medics are real people and yes they exist in the real world, and guesss what?
They heal wounds and patch people up to carry on with the fight or survive another day.
now call me a liar and tell me im wrong ?
and unless these new guns have technology to scan finger for identity or voice recigntition to stop sum1 using some1 elses weapon. Then it is not that hard to pick up some1 elses weapon . its not like they diserpear in war once u kill an enemy?
i mean realism n all that...
-
how could RSE missed what PC fans have wanted all along? realism and a simular game to GR1.
Graphics will be much better
Physics will Be used
Ragdoll will be used ( depending on the structure of the bones and how they model the character, determains how the model can fall n stuff )
Sounds will be better
Game play ... Well that was Xbox version and we know that the Console versions of this game were crap So lets wait till we see some PC footage or a demo or the game before we make decisions on how we like/hate .
-
ok cool , thats a better explanation of why
thanks.And basicly when you play AA you can get certain injuries that will make you worse over a period of a few minutes and ur health bar drops. the Medic is mostly to keep you stable condition to be able to shoot the gun and not fall and die of blood loss or shock or watever.. they are Not there to magicly heal you
I am not here to try and bring an unrealstic Feature to the game, but to try to explain and tell you that having a Medic in the game > CAN < be done right. although obviously we have no further information on the medic.
I agree with u about the Magicly healing thing that would be stupid. but i want to have realism as much as you but still be open for more featuers in the game that will work well, and this is 1 of them. use ur creativity and think. You have a worry because ur looking at other games that have a medic and how they throw realism away, GR is not other games
-
I don't mind a medic in SP. But for MP it is a definate no-no.
So having a medic in real life is not realistic either?
Americas army is also wrong and dont do the medic system well? has any1 played americas army and got complaints against the medic system?
-
Video 2.
ALL i i gotta say about the physics is " WOW " . did you see how the tower collapsed !. awesome
-
I dont care what anyone says about a medic what happened in that demo was disgraceful,anything that resembles a tactical shooter DOES NOT have medics reviving people to full health, and that is what happened plain and simple.
how do you know that he was completely healed? I think your not looking at the big picture of a medics role, he is to keep players in the game ( in the campaign ) Control bleeding and things. Medics are used in real life all the time to keep soldiers in the fight as long as possible and to save their life.
The guy that got hit. how do u know where he got hit. it might of been a scrape or got shot in the leg.
Like america's army... it dont magicly give them full health! it stops them from getting worse and dying !
or is that to much to understand
-
This is how i see it.
- GR 1 was different on the Xbox ( more arcade ) than it was on the PC
- The new GR engine is using Soft Shadows, Dynamic lighting and othe new technology
- It still has kept the GR look to it
- The medic is sensible if used right
- Ragdoll effects are a step forward than Animations !
- Physics engine will give better gameplay if ithey make it relevent to the game play.
- running speed was fine ( few people mentioned that )
Listen... this was E3, they wanted to show people a game, there is no point in showing a game where you are stealthy and you kill 2 enemies in 11 minutes.
The 3rd person thing, They wanted to show off the game , character movements and animations. They could not of achieved that effectivly with the Reticule View.
AND FINALLY .... Face it... you hardcore GR fans like a " Dull " game where you kill an enemy every 10 minutes, that wasnt going to work so they had to Give a all out arcady part of the game.
( dont take offense to that but thats what it seems like )
And wait actually , what is actually arcadey about that battle. Some of you experienced Fire fights in real life ?
I noticed the AI were dumb and just stood there and these are probably bugs. Remember its a BETA, there are loads of bugs to be fixed.
Ive been in the Joint Operations Beta for a while now, and i can seee how much improvements are made every day, im sure RSE will get on it and the PC players will get what they want Almost
-
You know this war takes place in the future, THey are bringing this drug out for soldiers to stop them from feeling Pain as you would when u got shot , in order for them to carry on with the fight untill they can be evac.
so 1 day that might be possible, and this is in the future.
but still... i agree it was stupid how he got patched and then fixed up. But like i said before they should have medics to control bleeding to keep ur guy alive for the campaigns next mission.
-
Well from the video it definitly looks more fun than the 1st GR single player missions. ALSO watch the video carefuly and how charactors react and things its quite good the 2nd time i watched it.
what do you all think of the action shown ,
its awesome in my opinion
-
LoL did any1 see the medic in the 11 minute video ?
Was he in pain after he got shot moaning and stuff ?....
-
did any1 see the frame rate drop quite low aswell in that 11 minute video lol
-
-
everything we have seen so far in console ?
wasnt GR supposed to be originaly for console aswell ....
anyway yes very disapointed so far, ALTHOUGH! i didnt like the console versions of the [Ghost Recon]
so there is hope -
well was i impressed at the end of the 11 minute trailer. simple answer.
no
-
well become a member ! its for free =/
its xbox interview ? where did it say taht and if you look carefully how they are moving the reticule it does look like its being used on a xbox controller because it aint smooth like Mouse n keyboard
What would classic Tank look like............
in GR2 PC - [Cancelled]
Posted
I'll look forward to playing this map when its released, thanks