Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by deco147

  1. The classes that we already have in multiplayer are reasonably “balancedâ€. I can see no reason to change the existing classes, but adding new classes would be positive. I like the new tracker class. Why not create a special class that has the kit combinations that players have always wanted? But give admin the power to choose if players can select weapons from this class. Create special classes for sniper only, handgun only, light machine gun only, submachine gun only, assault rifle only and shotgun only matches.
  2. Will this patch allow admin to restrict weapons classes? Can we select are own weapons? Are there any improvements to the deathcam? What about replays?
  3. I was just highlighting the fact that GRIN UBISOFT likes to be secretive (about updates). And that has not changed.
  4. http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/764/764975p2.html “GRAW 2: PC Developer Tells All†“IGN: What downloadable content can we expect to see following the launch? Nouredine Abboud: We are planning on bringing some downloadable content after launch but, right now, we can't get too specific because we'd like to keep it secret. What we can say is that the way the community uses the maps and content we give them at launch will affect how we react, as it was with GRAW 1. We brought in new modes when the community wanted them.†WHY?
  5. I have already said that I would pay for an expansion pack that gives us a lot more multiplayer content, more maps and more weapons. But why not include in this expansion pack some ‘classic’ ghost recon missions as well? Huge maps, freedom to take any path, the old health meter, no ‘fancy’ gadgets etc. I honestly do not believe that the ‘old’ classic ghost recon fans will ever get a game like the original again. If a 'classic' ghost recon game was going to be made then it would have been made by now. But it could be possible that some ‘classic’ ghost recon content could be put into an expansion pack.
  6. Deco147, Can you please give us a link to your source for this information? Where did this number come from? I hope this is verifiable via a reliable and accurate source and not just rumor.
  7. I doubt it very much - too little, too late unfortunately. No doubt we'll dl the patch when it comes, check the new content, then go back to playing CoD4, Crysis & UT3. Patch 1.05 is a good start. GRAW2 PC has already sold 600,000 units. Therefore there is a very good chance much more content will be added to this game in the future. This is the beginning of GRAW2 not the end.
  8. According to the server info on the "TEST01 London" server: There are 3 new maps, industry, dominion and retrieve. The retrieve map appears to be for coop only. The old sierra coop map is no longer exclusively just for coop. So in effect dm, tdm, hh and rvsa players should have 3 ‘new’ maps to play on and coop players will have 1 new map to play on.
  9. "We just where told the final number from UBI to Grin for GRAW1 PC was 820000 units sold. And currently GRAW2 PC is at about 600000 units sold." The GRAW series for the PC is clearly making UBISOFT plenty of money. I think it is a certainty that GRAW3 for the PC is going to be made.
  10. Ghost Recon game play: Vs. GRAW2 game play: Ghost Recon is good but GRAW2 is better. Ghost Recon multiplayer: ???? vs. GRAW2 multiplayer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxD9_2IOf3w
  11. The GRAW series for the PC is a new breed of game. The GRAW series was designed for the tactical-action gaming community not the ‘tactical-simulation’ gamming community. The ‘tac-sim’ community do not care for GRAW3. The tactical-action gamming community want GRAW3! Incidentally, what were the sales for GRAW 1 and 2 on the PC? What were the sales of the [Ghost Recon] game on the PC?
  12. GRAW2 wins! KO 1ST ROUND! (That is my view) I just can’t see what is so great about Ghost Recon. You guys keep knocking GRAW2 down but you keep on praising Ghost Recon. What was so great about Ghost Recon? Artificial intelligence? Military tactics? Realistic Weapons? Multiplayer? Map design? Story? Graphics? Sounds? You can change between soldiers? Realism? entertainment value? Missions? What exactly? Is it simply that some of you guys are just obsessed with Ghost Recon?
  13. Which game is better? And why is it better?
  14. Thank you for the advice, but I will respectfully decline. Nothing to get emotional or concerned about, it wasn't meant to steer a response, just alittle good-natured ribbing. The poll was intended, as Kretzj put it, "informal" and not as you appear to think it should be, "professional". Participation in the poll (or the thread) is not mandatory. Let it drop. Yep. GR/DS/IT is still in circulation. ____ BTW: Rabbi might be off the reservation, but he's no oddball. I thought you guys were obsessed with professionalism and realism? Or is that just for the games you play? Ok, I let it drop. Maybe the Rabbi from Afghanistan is not an oddball. Then again maybe he is. (Just Joking!) You honestly think GR/DS/IT is a superior tactical-action first person shooter then GRAW2 for the PC? WHY?
  15. "... I think "bias" is assumed. " People may be biased towards certain types of games but it does not follow that the questions on this survey should be biased! Is there a tactical-action game on the market that is superior to GRAW2 for the PC? If yes what is it????????
  16. Change the questions on this survey! It should be: Yes Maybe No After the voter has voted he then has the freedom to justify his viewpoint in this forum. The survey at the moment is unprofessionally biased!
  17. To the oddball from Afghanistan who calls himself RAbbi_74: You can carry on playing the games you like and I will carry on playing the games I like. If you honestly think that there are superior tactical-action games on the market than GRAW2 for the PC then that is your problem not mine. GRAW2 isn’t perfect but is damn better than anything else on the market!
  18. Are you interested in GR:AW3? YES! The real problems with GRAW2 PC are: 1) Hardcore gamers do not have the power to set up their servers exactly how they desire. A monumental mistake, I just cannot understand why they did that. 2) Too few maps. 3) GRAW2 has a ‘poor’ deathcam. Deathcam is still the most important tool for determining whether or not a player is cheating or not. All the other ‘faults’ with GRAW2 are, in my opinion, superficial. All PC games have ‘bugs’. That is just the nature of PC games; there are just too many PC configurations. I expect most of the serious bugs to be fixed. GRAW2 for the PC sets the standards for tactical first person shooters. GRAW2 is the standard. GRAW2 is a man’s game. Games like COD4, Crysis, HL2, UT3 and GRAW2 on the Xbox 360 are for little ‘boys and girls’. They are fun to play but lack substance. Hardcore gamers play GRAW2 on the PC. I would expect improvements in the implementation of military tactics in GRAW3, I would expect superior graphics and sound, more interaction with the environment, superior artificial intelligence, superior physics, more real world weapons, multiplayer designed for hardcore gamers and perhaps the use of voice command. I have no doubt that GRAW3 will be superior to GRAW2. But at this moment in time GRAW2 for the PC is the best tactical-action shooter on the planet, period.
  19. In the multiplayer demo Of GRAW2 I can select Generic Hardware as the renderer and set the sound quality to extreme. But in the full version of GRAW2 I can only select generic software as the renderer and set the sound quality to medium. Why? I am using the sound card supplied with the striker extreme motherboard.
  20. 1. Yes, I would pay for an expansion pack. People do not work for free! Only Santa Clause’s little elves work for free. And I don’t think any of them work for UBISOFT or GRIN!
  21. “well adding an expansion pack is like adding more crap to the crap kettle. you know that white spot on the top of chicken crap? that's chicken crap too.†GRAW2 has faults but to call it ‘crap’ is ludicrous! Why do you automatically assume that a multiplayer expansion pack would be ‘crap’?
  22. Most of the people who voted “No. Been there, done that†will probably buy GRAW3 if it was made! The GRAW series is not perfect, but the series is damn better than anything else on the market. Instead of making GRAW3 why not make a HUGE [and I mean HUGE] multiplayer expansion pack for GRAW2?
  23. http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2...13/m/9061020806 This comment is from ColinCJ, who is one of the moderators of the Ubisoft forums.
  24. What I would like to see in a new patch: 1) At the moment all demolition weapons, in multiplayer, have 2 grenades, Change this to just one grenade. 2) Give admin the power to eliminate any weapon class from the multiplayer ‘choose your class’ page e.g. eliminate sniper 3 class or eliminate all demolition classes. 3) Slow down the time it takes to put the M99 into ‘zoom view’. There is no reason why the M99 should have a zoom that is so much quicker than any other sniper weapon. In fact, given that the M99 is the heaviest weapon it should have the slowest zoom. 4) The deathcam is an extremely important tool for determining whether or not a player is cheating or not. Change the current deathcam view to the exact same view the actual player has i.e. the same IDENTICAL view you would have if you were actually playing GRAW2 multiplayer. 5) Add more multiplayer maps 6) Fix as many ‘bugs’ as possible I have played hundreds of different games on numerous consoles and computers, and GRAW2 for the PC is the best game I have ever played. GRAW2 has the right blend of realism and arcade action.
  • Create New...