calius

@ Para .. Ive mentioned this before in a thread along time back. And not once am I suggesting Rocky runs this place like a one sided show he doesn't and I know that, so don't try to put words into my mouth, or maybe you misread my point. I was responding to WK ref its Rocky's show if you have issue, if anything I was referring to someone OTHER than Rocky. This was my main point if you actually re-read it again: And all I'm saying is there's a fine line with what gets posted like this much like "other" threads where its not far from a political debate (lets be honest how near is t

* cough * I did actually state: That goes for the one in the very past also. All I'm pointing out is how can you talk about even corruption and banks without it being political? Thats what I was really speaking about. So then going by that stance don't all posts and threads like this need to be either banned and deleted to help pre-empt an oh-so-easy discussion that will obviously get political in some way? Its ok I don't suffer short memory syndrome so no need to repeat the point. But then shouldn't posts much like DS's recent ones be banned or locked on that basis? Or is i

Thats like a gag order saying .. "don't talk about it please". I thought political discussion was frowned at in the military forum? Anyway its hard to post these things and expect silence, but at least your letting it be posted so that's a good thing. I just find sometimes it gets locked if people agree a lot with it in certain ways whereas it seems ok to leave unlocked when people who disagree firmly state their case. Things in the past went this way. I don't see why you don't simply leave the conspiracy theory thread open to all opinions but lock anything else (but dont dele

So the governments & Hollywood and past presidents are all paranoid? (because my point was from that perspective) BTW that article in the BBC was laughable, I mean they picked the most obvious things to poke a old hat stick at simply to have a justified article for "the other side take a stand". It literally saying, people are fed up with the other people asking questions and they are taking a stand against the people asking the questions as if that must be the right thing to do no matter what, no real balance to it. The good ole left/right divide and rule thing rides again Remembe

Same could be said for this chap ..... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=32e_1253243625

I think the worst would be the sound of 2 cats screeching at one another, but only take 4 seconds of it and put on permanent 4 sec loop for 1 day.

@DS ... LOL ... Manford is great, prefect example to use. BTW is it me or is Youtube really ###### to skip through where you want very well, bit rusty. Anyway, I hate to bring this into the mix (but you know me) ... remember that old ronnie and a few are very well connected up top and "placing the idea" of outer attack or another "them" brings the point of reagans speech and oddly enough what Jason manford was saying, we would "all come together as one world" in a situation such as that. Remember War Of The Worlds back in the day was a psy-op test and that worked pretty well, I thi

Im shocked and stunned I moved from Ghost Recon (loved that to death) to Arma1 then Arma2 and I wont ever really change back. Arma1/2 are the sandbox that I got introduced to via Ghost Recon and then some. When I realised I could knock up missions and scenarios that blew me away in Ghost Recon pretty easy with a few scripts, that was it for me. I cant see the relation to GRAW onwards to Arma2 .. bit like the current Dragon Rising V Arma2 thing, both are nearly comic books in comparison to what you can actually have and do with arma, totally open book. It got with me that GRAW o

Heres a new video using the new AI improvements ... Now starting to look like AI are a cohesive team

Yes indeed, but if hollywood has its way its all about the end of the world, and the new 2012 film (cant be bothered to link it becuase its so stupid) is also by the makers of Independence Day ... hmmmm nice little topic link by the same people. usual Hollywood tripe used to mask any proper details ... 2012 the new Y2K .. for clones.

If only every Sunday was like this.

Apart from the odd hiss and maybe a "grrrrrrrrr" *fist wave* Maybe some people think that's actual a good idea Its true though with young offenders. Anyone see that BBC doc about racism in Bristol? 11 year olds threatening a woman and all sorts. I have to say to U.S folk don't do what we probably do about the US and assume its in many places, you will find like most things it mainly centered in poorer estate areas to be honest. The stats in the media get highlighted but as a population as a whole its not a knife pandemic as they try to say it is. That said the places and peop

That was a sneaky edit wasn't it Para? Last time I looked nothing of pics and final words .. hmmm. The pics do not prove anything, scale of building to pile ratio & mass left over = most gone to dust ... where else did it go, didnt fly away did it ... common sense right? I didnt say small pile "literaly" did now Para, I was trying to explain the amount left over vs the amount the building were before hand even you must have known that. Nit picking words and phrases is cheap. BTW yes crap was spread and embedded all over the place, which is also strange when shown the force for s

http://forums.bistudio.com/showpost.php?p=...mp;postcount=30 Keep a look at this thread its a pre-alpha (no download yet) of new approach to AI observe and attack enemy for AI. Much more impressive than stock Arma2 AI. Above link is the main post describing situation and a youtube vid to show it. Complete thread here: http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=88194

I still look at my boxes and the expansions Thanks for that vid, I was actually expecting it to be a little longer and slightly more in depth than talking heads but anyway still classic. I must say Im now a firm Arma1/2 nut now since GRAW went a direction I wasn't into, but I still love the look of GR even when watching the in game video clips. I noticed what I can only see as the first draft GR logo in the background on that vid ... glad they updated it Such a classic. And its a shame that not even a 2009 sandbox sim like ARMA2 cant still get the death animation as good and as va

I agree Para. But then millions wouldn't and also many who push the info about this year. Loads about end of world, then loads about "new age" .. then loads about second coming ... (god or alien) ... lots n lots.

How can you counter someone with a question? Why counter anyone ... see its that wording thats strikes me as ego bashing. don't bash my belief otherwise I will counter you ... bit played out. Im not countering you or anything, im just putting some balance in the mix. As you ask anyway ... Think of every event and law that has been passed since the event took place and look deeper into its future impact. First of why would you go to that trouble if your going to have them fly into it, which would mean your were privvy to that happening. Mainly becuase if it was bombed outrigh

Armstrong & Miller are great, one of the best duo's on UK TV at the moment, isn't it blaad.

This family or the parents have had some "reality TV" history with certain shows. I mean thats the most obvious thing of all. How sad for your parents to go to such lengths sucked into the whole reality TV turd. They bought into that so much they pulled this stunt and the sons life was the "reality for tv" ... pretty sad and twisted when you think it through. If it was me (I wouldn't even begin to try that crap) to make it worth while, I would have put a blow up doll inside wearing a strap-on with a swaztika on its head ... now that might have gave the reality TV more of an "edge". I

Yes indeed I really get my rocks of with it . In fact I don't .. at all. I just believe in some balance that's all. Shades of grey all the way. And I hereby declare a classic example of the oh so perfectly designed left/right paradigm .

We are civil I hope ... I love you realy Para Im not posting to prove people wrong point by point, that would go on forever. What I am trying to explain (or maybe understand) is how some people with the cut & dried "its BS" mind can realy get to that 100 percent conclusion when theirs so much to this that shows that particular stand point is nearly as mental as the other end of the spectrum "no plane theory" massive At least some middle ground. Anyway D.S ... this is the thing, no one, NO ONE ... can "explain away" that part of it, 2 of them doing the same thing, obliterated down

God damn in Para, that's it, you have single handedly sorted this whole mess out in one post, I commend you sir Just small issue with pretty much everything you posted, can you tie your simple science into that day as absolute fact? It pretty much answers nothing in the grand scheme of the event, but on the fundamental side of things nothing you said was nuts and makes sense (see I agree on things, I don't twist anything). Anyway it wasn't "deep within" any pile ... it was in the basement areas under the first floor (molten streams), and the huge pile of rubbles mass you speak of that

Very good point. Actually to throw another angle into the mix. Keep your eyes open about 2012 and this kind of thing in parallel, remember an external invasion would be the next "unkown enemy" of all time, perfect to group the masses world wide into a "one world belief system" I think visitation etc is old hat and been done time over, but the push to have it like an invasion or to not let us know a thing about it and then land a biggy on everyone has its "global benefits"

Well fair enough on the media front Although the commons sense thing ... I have a thought on that. Ok .... 9/11 has never happened, its September the 1st 2001 and we are here chatting via this forum about accidents or some extreme examples of attack etc. Someone posts ... Now ... what would common sense at that time be for your reply? Next, someone chips into the thread and posts the following: Now, remember .. its September the 1st 2001 .. your common sense would kick in, I wonder how that thread discussion would go?

Replace the word 'internet' from your point/quote and exchange it with 'mainstream media' .... and I can guess that's where you got your final versions from, plus your point still applies to yourself also with the word changed going by that logic. Like I say, no ones exempt. Again flip it the other way and the same could be said for you and where you got your information from to make your conclusions a firm "no" (referring back to quote logic number 1). So a catagoric "no" with everything thats come since that day in terms of footage, statements, more footage (un-edited .. not mainstre