[Spawn Limit]

Oh, this talking about "good" is ###### !!!

I followed the M99 awareness week thread and noticed that the people who really stand up for leaving the M99 as it is are the same who like spawnrestriction and it seems that this discussion here may also be a discussion about playing as a sniper or not.

Sure, the snipers don't usually need many respawns, because they stay out of the action. God damn, nobody forces you to go into the action if you don't want to, but if you have limited spawns, you are forced to stay out of it if you don't want to watch the rest of the round from deathcam. Do you really want this game to be "snipers only" ?

And the second point is, that it is really egoistic to say: "I'm sooo damn good, I do not die, so why should there be respawns"

[Spawn Limit]

I don't really get why spawnlimit would make a Siege or HH game more 'exciting' ?

The game should not be about trying to stay alive, while others deplete their spawns trying to reach the objective.

For those not able to respawn the game definitely does not get more exciting, and the others could have gone to another server, if they think playing with less players is more exciting.

I can understand, that spawnlimit helps to keep players from doing annoying suicide runs, but this can also be managed by increasing the respawn time or even limiting the grenade launcher.

Those who aren't that experienced or simply prefer a more offensive play style and therefor die more often shouldn't have their games ruined by long wait times. In my experience those still playing while the others have no spawns left are often not the good players but rather some camping noobs which makes things even worse.

The fun with gametypes like Siege or HH is that you have to come up with a plan to reach your objective without just depleting the respawns of the enemy team. That's what makes those gametypes exciting.

Now I'd like to hear your arguments, why playing with spawnlimit should be more fun ?

And I don't want to hear: "It's more realistic!"