Agent Smith

IMO, the stock UI doesn't look that great. Are there any mods in existance that change it? I did a Search, and I came up with nothing. I would prefer one that made the UI a bit bigger, because at my LCD's native resolution (1680x1050) the UI is tiny.

Just played Alpha Squad. My god, this is what I wanted in the original game. Massive firefights + big map= Sweet. How come RSE didn't have maps like Alpha Squad does in the original game? Anyway, I really like the amount of weapons Alpha Squad added. I have my Riflemen equipped with M14s. Multiple headshots coming out from me Only lost a single guy so far.

Get into a CQC battle and I would like you to say that again. Lights: Alpha Squad has SP, right?

Ok, someone smack me in the face please. I've been doing some thinking lately, and I just realized that I am being a completely and stupid ignorant teen (Not a surprise there, yes!) I have a different opinion, and so will the next poster (Most likely). What the hell am I doing trying to say "MY OPINION IS SUPERIOR TO YOURS! I AM SUPERIOR TO ALL!", when I'm bound to get thrown into the ######ter? That's just insanely stupid! Now, after, what a day? I have finally realized that differing opinions go into arguments, which lead into flame wars, which lead into lockage, which lead into BAN

The AA Devs aren't like GRIN. They add their own features and they don't fix any bugs. EDIT: I'll say this again, PUBLISHERS DO NOT THINK LIKE GAMERS. This is why this industry needs to turn to digital distribution if it wants to survive. Otherwise, re-hash, re-hash, re-hash, dumbed down, shortened, simplistic, etc. That's the type of games we'll see if the publishers continue with their idiocy that they're doing now.

1st paragraph: Most Developers and publishers want money. They don't think like the gamer, they don't think how we gamers do. They're just in here to make a gigantic buck. That's why huge and ######astic companies like EA need to be destroyed immediately, and developers need to turn to digital distribution if they want creative freedom. Sentence: When a publisher knows that a series will sell because it's in a certain line of games, (Take example, the Mario name and Mario: Sunshine.) despite the content, they know it will sell, because it has that "Quality name". In the guitar world, it's

Hypercam I like the program. Gonna start making the video.

I never complained about it. All I said was, is in it's current status, GRAW needs more addition in the terms of optimization and game modes, not a simple three sentence post saying, "GRAW sucks! I can't kill anyone in it! I don't know where the fire at me is coming from!"

Can anyone recommend a in-game video recorder that is not Fraps, and is preferably free? I have Fraps, but when I record something, the file comes out way too big. I would like to record a video showing that AA is not a "simple arcade game".

If GRAW was the same as GR1, I wouldn't be here, and still playing AA. GRAW was messed around with because there is only one thing that only a few developers don't care about: Cash. Most publishers/developers are in the industry to make cash, and nothing else. Not to make a kickass game, like Valve is trying to do. GRAW was made into what it is today so it can be made mainstream that way the average Joe can play it.

To those saying that AA is arcade-like: Have you even played it? Have you even been in a firefight that doesn't last a few seconds? Have you had a 203 round explode behind you, your body hit, your bleeding, and your aim is going wild? Have you had enemy fire come at you, and your aim is again going wild whenever you raise your ironsights. Have you seen how slow you run when you're Red? Have you noticed the heavy emphasis the game has on using ironsights? Download the damn game before saying anything like "AA is arcade-like."

I have been destroyed, my purpose is now longer in the system. The Source will not allow me back in, for I have been too powerful, and nearly destroyed the entire system inside out. Mr. Anderson has not been present inside the system since our last battle.

hey your profile says you're born in 1991.. Gaming at 4 years old is a shocker to you? How strange.

Step 1 to not being biased: THERE IS NO PERFECT GAME AND THERE IS NO "GOD-LIKE" GAME. With that being said, that means you should have experience with other games in the same genre before speaking. Now, before you say anything to me, I've been a gamer for 11 years. Starting from the early FPS days of Wolf 3D, Doom 2, and Duke 3D back in 1995. My gamer timeline: PC: Throughout the entire timeline. PS1 N64 Gameboy Pocket Gameboy Color DreamCast Gameboy Advance PS2 Xbox GameCube DS PSP (This year) Xenon (For those that are not that hardcore like me, the 360.) So, I feel I

Heh... some "mature" community. Considering the average age of a GR1 fan, I was expecting a more intelligent conversation to go around rather than handfuls of rotten ###### to be thrown at my face because I consider hardcore combat "the core". Some community....

More info about me: I am a realism nut. I know the velocity of the 5.56x45mm round and the .50 cal round, as well as the potential of a .45 ACP round and .50 round can do to a man (.45 ACP= 1 round to the chest, he's down for the count. .50 cal to the head= It explodes). I want utter realism in my games, just like some of the older GR players. But I have realized something within the past few days. The fact is, if you want realism, GO OUT AND ENLIST! Games are not suppose to be simulators. They are meant to escape from reality and to be in a fantasy world.

1. Did you see how many versions of AA I have played? 9 of them. Compared to my 3 of CS (1.5, 1.6, and Source). CS is probably the worst excuse that you can have for an online FPS. 2. Does a soldier think when he's in an insane firefight? No, he uses instincts to survive. 3. As I said in my original post, the GR series severely lacks feeling. This can be achieved with a superior sound system, proper visual effects (Recoil from weapons, First person weapons, etc.), gore (Believe it or not, gore actually adds to immersion and feeling), and intensity.

(THIS IS ALL IMO) Back in 2001, the little known FPS named Ghost Recon was first released. It was released in the shadow of the PS2, so it didn't get the proper "recognition" as some might say. The reason why I saw don't make GRAW like GR1 is because of this: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." GRAW isn't broken. It just needs more optimization and more modes and more features. That's it not fixing it, that's adding to it. And, GR1 was also dubbed inferior a year later on, by the best online FPS to ever see such a long life span. And that, is America's Army. My statement f

I'm trying to uninstall the drivers, but it says it can't find the uninstall.exe. I have version 2.4.3., should I downgrade it?

Statement confirmed. You want the real thing? Go do the real thing, enlist. I want my Run-n'-gun DM, I could care less about LMS.

######? You serious?

Uhh..... I already did this, with more features. http://www.ghostrecon.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=36257

Ok, if anyone is wondering if that is me, IT IS NOT ME. I don't go on the UBI forums. They suck badly, and are filled with whiners.

Did you read the original post?

I'm interested. How much of a gain?