Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by UberSoldier

  1. Wille, If Graw was a fun game to play, everyone by now would have realised that all the changes were for the better; that's not the case, the MP is not good at all. I will give you a reality check, this game is so bad that WhiteKnight77 is avoiding commenting on the game. No offense to WhiteKnight77 but if he say's he doesn't have the game yet it tells you something and don't forget the few hundred online players.
  2. RSE had like 5 months to make Lockdown PC, but it still has a more complete MP than GR:AW PC. LD shipped with TDM, DM, a number of other game types and it has more MP maps than GR:AW PC. It can even be argued that it looks better than GR:AW PC as well. (Both games lack a standalone dedicated server, and proper admin tools). In my opinion RSE needs the proper amount of time to make a game. Look at GR:AW 360 (started around the same time as GR:AW PC), its still #2 on Xbox Live a few months after release. Think about this, if 360 got the PC game, do you think it would be #2 on Live? I think not. 360 is a pretty darn good game, and it really feels like a sequel to GR1. One only has to look at the non-RSE produced GR titles (GR1 Jungle Storm, GR2 PS2, GR:AW PS2, GR:AW Xbox, GR:AW PC) to see that Red Storm has a really good handle on the Ghost Recon series. Notice something about those other GR games? They aren't nearly as good, or true to the original, as those produced by RSE. I don't hesitate to include GR:AW PC in that group either. RSE deserves to get another, proper, crack at a PC GR title. Give them 2 years, and they'll probably make GR:AW PC look like a bad dream. So what do I want in GR4 PC? I want a proper Red Storm produced sequel. I'm with you 120%.
  3. Yes I know that all those that complaint are retartded. I'm sorry for complaining tony. Here let me make you feel better Like I said I will be playing a real tactical game soon. http://www.insurgencymod.net/
  4. Way to go. Is this some type of deversion. I can't believe that you actually took the time to to breakdown my post's. That say's a lot about you, it says that you are blinded by your dislike of those that point out the flaws of this game. If i was you I would concentrate my efforts and time in more finding out why this game a game that had this community's support turn out to be such a disappointment. Look for all the dev chats this community had, look for what was asked and what we got. You are more than welcome to discredit me is ok. Yes I'm upset and like the rest of the community I would have loved for this game to be one of the best but it turn out to be a dud.What is unacceptable is that the fans of this game clearly stated what they wanted and we got what some board of directors wanted. All they had to do what go to the forums an listen to what the real experts had to say. The original had a winning formula all they need it to do was to build on that.
  5. Few others this game has sold more than 500,000 unit's wre are the rest. If you support low quality you well keep getting low quality.
  6. What good did it do for the game play. I'm sorry if my standards are not that low.
  7. Im sure you would, you definitley dont sound like the Martin Luther king type. We all have our way of expressing ourselves. Want to complain? Ubi forums. Want to post constructive feedback? GR.net Anyways, I'm done in this thread. It's going no where. Give an example of the benefits of the constructive feedback.
  8. Is ok keep you have the right to defend a sub-par amature attempt and keep waiting all you want. This game was made for noobs like you. You got what you deserved. 2006 next patch :wall 2007 next patch next patch 2008 I got to fight the forces of evil . I can't abandon this big patch called GRAW.
  9. Easy on the insults. Me and the others with a valid point are not donkey's. Show a little respect just cause you don't agree with some of us doesn't give you the right to offend us.
  10. but GRin is one of a few devs. that I've been able to give feedback to so openly. It's a bumpy start but it will pick up , and be what it wanted to be.
  11. High level of realism yeah right. You know years ago there was a mod for UT that was called Infiltration and that mod had more realism than this game. Is ok if you like it but the numbers don't lie if this game is so good like some here claim it would had been a hit.
  12. Are going to compare 9000 vs 300 online players give me a break. If you look at the sales this game has sold 500,00 units or more and less than 10% is playing it online. That say's something.
  13. This is the never ending story don't you get it. When this game came it was well we are working on a patch to make this game better.The June patch came and still the same aoutcome. But the funny thing is the optimist keep reasuring that it will get better. Month's from now there will be like 25 optimist playing and wandering were did everyone go.
  14. OK men we have lost this ship and this battle. This game had the potential and the community's input were did it go wrong, I don't know but is mainly the publisher's fault by giving the job to a team of guys with very little experience. I know Grin did their best, but their best wasn't good enough. I said it before no patches were going to fix this game. I know some of you will get upset but what else is there tell me. TDM is not going to save this game. It will be the same 200 players until they realize that it's a failure. The only way we could get a true sequel is if the original dev team for GR makes another version. http://www.insurgencymod.net/
  15. Ok fine the community appreciates that. But if your team would have done 40% of what the community asked this major blunder would have been avoided. This game will go down in GR history as the worst attempt to make a GR sequel. Eventually people will realise is true.
  16. I agree with you 120% and it would have been had they implemented a mere 25% of what the community asked for. Having contact with the developers hasn't benefited this community until now. Hopefully this will change.
  17. But they never listen. Man what about all the stuff this community posted and all the dev chats. The community clearly stated what they wanted and Whitenight went and met with them and he delivered the fans message all those words all that effort and still the game lacks must of what we asked. Now what are you going to say " no no let's give them time please let's not upset them if not they won't listen " Give me a break.
  18. Don't waist any money on that card it's outdated technology. I know you are on a budget but do this go to newegg.com or monarchcomputer.com find a cheap PCI express mainboard and then you could go to Ebay and get a 6800gt PCIe for less than $150. Here's is an idea mobo is socket 939 is http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...82E16813131569R CPU http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16819103537 GPU http://computers.search.ebay.com/6800gt_Vi...Z1QQsacatZ40156 Think about it.
  19. I played in MDKSEALS server a few days ago and I had a lot fun. The pings were low and the players behaved in a mature way. Server MDKSEALS 7/10 Ping low 80's to 150
  20. You know I think that it is not cool to make fun of others and Budd never insulted you or wrote in a sarcastic way, GRIN guy. I've seen some of your people ridicule community members before and this is a great example. Some of you believe that you are superior but guess what Grin should be called GREEN cause that's what you are, a bunch of amateurs programmers that were not and are not capable of making a GR sequel. Your maps look like bad Hollywood B movie sets yeah B movie sets, they look fake and let's not get in to the bugs. So my suggestion is don't make fun of other community members points or suggestions next time respond in a mature way. GR:Advanced Mediocrity.
  21. The MP maps are somewhat boring they lack something. Grin has to release some new maps in different enviroments. The Domination mode is ok but I think new well designed maps will help.
  22. Good Point Reb, beats alot of speculation on our parts I wonder what would have happened if ubi told grin to use another game engine like Crytek's CryEngine. With some modifications this would have been ideal. CryENGINE is a game engine used for the first-person shooter computer game Far Cry. It was originally developed by Crytek as a technology demo for nVidia and, when the company saw its potential, it was turned into a game. When video cards with support for 2.0 pixel and vertex shaders were released, Crytek released version 1.2 of the engine which used some of the capabilities for better graphics. Later the company developed version 1.3, which had support for even longer 2.0b and 3.0 version shader instructions. In cooperation with ATI it created a machinima demo project called "The Project", loosely based on the world and levels of Far Cry. The demo featured some of the most realistic real-time graphics to date, compared with previous ATI demo Doublecross. This technology will be used by Crytek for their next game titled Crysis. It also supports HDR.
  23. but talking about realism its realistic lighting, photo-realistic Apparently you never seen Valve's The Lost Coast now that's realistic lighting and with AA filtering It runs circles around Graw's HDR . When ever you a chance set it to 4x AA filtering and 16X AF filtering and you will see that Valve's Source engine has superior lighting system and it runs smooth too.
  24. HI Grin: Do you think you could include AA filtering in the june patch. I mean an option to turn HDR off to get AA working ala Oblivion. Bethesda was able to include the option and since none of us have cards right now that will combine the HDR and AA and they won't be available for a while and even then some or most are not going to have the money to get a new card. The game needs it without it if feels like an old game. One more question are there any plans for your Diesel engine to support dual core CPU's. Thanks.
  • Create New...