Sure, Wabby, but how much?
Look, you're asking if a $130 entry-level gaming card will run max settings on a game that the devs said you needed $500 high-end enhusiast card to even get close to max settings. The answer is simple -- NO. You won't be running max settings with a card in the entrey-level price range.
I can't even find reviews of the 1600pro card, but the earlier link to midrange cards benchmarked on F.E.A.R. had the X1600XT, and
@ 1280x1024 -- 23f/s (unplayable)
@ 1024x768 -- 33 f/s(playable, but not smooth and will stutter)
Keep in mind, that's the 1600XT which is better than the 1600pro you're asking about. The 1600pro is not meant to play new games maxed out; it's meant to allow people to play current games at medium to low resolutions with medium to low settings.
Also, if I remember correctly, you were getting a 17 or 19 inch LCD. If that's the case, that means your LCD's native resolution is 1280x1024 and you NEED to play games at 1280x1024 for the games to look right.
If that's the case, that means that at an absolute, bare minimum you want a 7600GT at the $180 pricepoint, which will run F.E.A.R. @ 1280x1024 at a barely playable 31 f/s, but more likely you want a 7900GT at the $300 pricepoint, which will run F.E.A.R. at 41 f/s at that resolution.
If you can't swallow $300 for a vidcard, and most people understandably can't, then go for the $180 7600GT. It's your best option. If you can't swallow the $180, save until you can. I wouldn't go for less than that.
Keep in mind that this is all estimation based off of one of the most demanding games out right now and an assumption that GR:AW will be similar in its demands. GR:AW may be more demanding. GR:AW may be a little less demanding. We don't know yet. And anyone who is thinking of upgrading would be better off waiting for the demo (at least) to be released before actually upgrading.
←
Well, i have £200 to play with, but that needs to get me a DVD+-rw aswell. . .