Leaderboard

I dunno. I don't expect anything.

Here's the thing, they have delayed the release of the beta - but what are they going to do now? They most certainly have not delayed the beta so they can fine tune it to make it the best "player experience", because they have been working on it for 3 years! So what are they doing?

Ground Branch is pretty good too. I prefer it over Zero Hour.

@Rocky I believe that this kind of posture will further weaken Ubisoft, reducing its credibility (if it still has any with the Ghost Recon community). I've been going through some youtube channels (famous and not so famous) and it seems that the opinion is unanimous: GR Frontline (as announced) is a freak and it was a huge mistake by the company! Wake up Ubisoft, there is still time to resolve this error! Aranha

It's actually worse than that, they didn't ask Delta Force members for their thoughts about Frontline at all - they went ahead with this gametype without engaging with anyone in the GR community. Your posts are perfect English, don't worry!

So nothing changed at Ubi. Guys, you might want to check Zero Hour instead. Nice to be home again btw. Ultimate website!

Today I was reading about the issue of DELTA COMPANY, and it seems that there is a lot of criticism of this program, because in addition to not selecting people who are really part of the "Ghost Recon community", Ubisoft simply did not listen to the comments of the community itself. I think they should schedule a new meeting with us, tell the fans that they messed up and that they are developing a new GR, in the mold of the classic games we love so much! How about a GR in the Middle East in a "fictional country" (to avoid any problems, as there was with Bolivia) . Let's go ahead! Note: As I don't speak English fluently, I use Google Translate to write my posts. I apologize in advance for any contextual error in my entries. Thanks! Aranha

A game like Frontline at anytime is a bad news day for "Ghost Recon", but to announce it as part of 20th Anniversary celebrations was such a howler...

Hello everyone! I saw the presentation from beginning to end, and I confess that the beginning excited me (all that stuff about listening to the community, tactical games and etc), but after I saw that LEGACY wasn't a "collection" and all the other slips, I think the franchise is nearing its end (at least, as we know it). I've been following GR for many years (like most here), and I was expecting a nice (updated) collection and a new game...maybe Wildland 2, in the middle east, with "semi-open" maps and a great backstory . They talked and talked about the importance of the community and all the fans, but when they present something like FRONTLINE, they are clearly contradicting everything they said! Could it be that only us fans we've followed for years (and spent money buying the games) see? Ubisoft will have to work hard on a completely new GR to trim this disastrous presentation! Hugs from Brazil. Aranha

They have ideas at odds or incompatible with GR root gameplay. They hear and see what they want to. Throw in some "group-think" and you get Ghost Recon Frontline.

This is what bewilders me, I have been vocally banging that drum for years, I even delivered that message right to the devs when I sat in the same room as them in Paris. You only have to read a handful of comments deep into any Ghost Recon YouTube video these days and you will see the same sentiment over and over.

Yeh, Wildlands developed into a great game that was true to many of the franchise roots.

They don't seem to realise that literally all they have to do is remaster GR1 and GR2 for the 20th anniversary and fans will be satisfied. They keep talking about 'going back to it's roots' but every time it's just a mention here and there that the old games happened. With all the effort and most likely money they spend trying to shimmy references in last minute, they could literally just remaster the games. There's a part of me that hopes Frontline is one of a few announcements to be made over the next few days. It looks like a quick throw-together project based on the breakpoint backend which wouldn't have taken long to do with such a large team. Buuuut part of me is thinking Ubisoft are going down the road of shoddy games and trend whoring rather than listening to their consumer base. At which point we can make our own 20th A shizzle, gents.

If it had SP or co-op play I might be slightly interested. The UbiSoft PR campaign is very energetic but also very typical. To be fair they have rolled out some new games like Wildlands and the Division that were met with a lot of derision but they stuck with them and patched them into good games. 20 years on I still play OGR co-op on Sundays with friends. I keep thinking, this has to get old at some point but it hasn't yet. A testament to a good game that has supplied some great mods to keep it going.