Jump to content
Ghost Recon.net Forums

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/07/20 in all areas

  1. 1 point
  2. I think you might be right Wombat. It probably seems silly but I was reluctant to do that for obvious reasons, unarmed prisoners and legal issues pertaining to war crimes, however I confess in my frustration I did attempt to wound one of them and killed him instead. I didn't have a pistol on hand. The M4 proved a tad too powerful. 😲! Right well, M9 it is. I'll let you know the outcome.
    1 point
  3. Apex, I downloaded the file linked at the beginning of this post - the Ghost Recon.app would not open - it said the file is damaged and cannot be opened. Am I using an older broken file? I pull up information on the .app and it says created and modified May 11. Jeff
    1 point
  4. I‘ve pinned this topic for now. Let‘s give the CENTCOM team some time to report in (or anyone else who knows how to contact them).
    1 point
  5. Even though modern computers can easily run Ghost Recon with drastically increased sight lines by removing fog, I find it plays better with fog than without it most of the time. In all seriousness, it's simple shooting mechanics make long range kind of boring and way too easy with the right weapon. While there are ways to balance it, there is usually some form of serious compromise that has to take place in order to make it work. My favorite maps tend to those with shorter sight lines like jungle maps and those with heavy fog. Urban is interesting, but feels kind of clunky to maneuver thr
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...