Jump to content

Ghost Recon Future Soldier


Photo

GR:FS BETA thoughts from a Cod fan


17 replies to this topic

#1 K1NG D3ATH 812

K1NG D3ATH 812

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:06 PM

Ok, i never played ghost recon before yesterday and i gotta say, i wish i had started with GR instead of Cod. its SOOO much more enjoyable. all the features, graphics, sounds just everything makes me enjoy it. Cod is fun but this actually feels like a serious objective based game. all they gotta do is fix a couple glitches(invisible gun on spawn -_-) and id say its about perfect

thoughts?

#2 phinux

phinux

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • XFire:phinux
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:44 PM

in my opinion Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2 for xbox 360 is far superior. especially when combined with the extra map packs. you should give it a try or watch a few videos on youtube.

#3 oSea_shepherdo

oSea_shepherdo

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 10:55 PM

I've played Ghost Recon since the original, COD since COD2, and Battlefield since 1942 and own all of all three series with the exception of the latest COD which i refused to buy. I like them each for what they are. They are three totally different games that are meant to be played differently. Ghost recon was always the middle ground. Mid sized to large maps(with a couple of exceptions), cool guns, tactical gameplay without vehicles. A requirement on communication and achieving objectives as a squad.

GR is now moving their bar towards the COD side and alienating their CORE audience. It is a shame that they are doing this, they had already moved away from the original formula with the advanced warfighter formula and now they are going even further away. GR:AW(and 2) were a stretch for the core gamers of this series, but it brought a slightly larger audience and we all learned to adapt. This game however, is pushing the limits of what I want out of a game. I do not find the beta truly enjoyable and it is not whetting my appetite for the game. Every other GR game was a "must have" for me and most of my gaming friends. This one is already pushing some of them out of the GR fold. I would not play another game when i had a new ghost recon title in hand for at least a couple of months. With GRFS i can see myself just going back to play battlefield within days and playing this occasionally when i have a few friends that want to play.

I am not happy with this title, though I will most likely own it and hope that I can get past the changes and accept it for what it is and isn't. I wish they would just take the Ghost Recon off the title and start it as another franchise, "Call of War: FS" or "Gears of Duty: FS" or "CallBattleGears:FS". Its got elements of all of them, but is not defining itself as a true GR, so dont sell it as one.

Edited by oSea_shepherdo, 20 April 2012 - 10:56 PM.


#4 K1NG D3ATH 812

K1NG D3ATH 812

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 11:10 PM

good points but bottom line is enjoyment, remove all your pre conceptions of what it should be and ask yourself if your having fun, thats what i do. just a thought

#5 oSea_shepherdo

oSea_shepherdo

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:39 AM

good points but bottom line is enjoyment, remove all your pre conceptions of what it should be and ask yourself if your having fun, thats what i do. just a thought


Well said K1NG. Thats what gaming is all about.

#6 ITI SERPICO IVI

ITI SERPICO IVI

    Recruit - 2nd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 54 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canal Winchester, OH

Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:02 PM

Shepherdo you bring up some great points. We kind of all knew this was coming. Ubisoft wants to please the gamers but wants to please the shareholders even more. And how do you do that? By making a game that is a cross between Gears, COD, and Battlefield.: 3 of the most successful franchises in the industry. I'm kind of torn, I do like some elements of GRFS but I hate others. I am however looking forward to co-op and campaign or just playing with my core friends and relaxing. And to me that's worth every penny!
Posted Image

#7 TheMazinTar

TheMazinTar

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14 posts

Posted 21 April 2012 - 10:22 PM

I am also a COD (or was), I have seen Battlefield 3, and I've played a bit of Gears of War; never once, though, have I played a Ghost Recon game (other than GR:FS).
I expected a really great game, but I didn't have any of the other GR games to compare it to, so I was pretty open to a different kind of shooter game. And I absoloutely love the beta for FS! The cover system is amazing, I love the gunsmith, and, having played COD: MW3 not twenty minutes ago (I was waiting for the FS server to go back up), I was just itching to get back to FS. I missed the shooting range, the cover system, and the third person perspective; so much that I only played two matches of MW3!
I am blown away by the beta for this game, and I cannot wait for the full game to come out!

(P.S. The only thing(s) I don't like about the beta is that it is very temperamental with the server working or not, and you can't do ANYTHING on there without the server. A sampler of the other game modes would be fantastic!)

#8 Tinker

Tinker

     

  • Staff
  • 7,806 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 21 April 2012 - 10:56 PM

(P.S. The only thing(s) I don't like about the beta is that it is very temperamental with the server working or not


Unfortunately that is the whole point in a beta. You either have some patience and play when you can, or leave it and wait the game release.
Posted Image

#9 oSea_shepherdo

oSea_shepherdo

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 April 2012 - 05:58 AM

Shepherdo you bring up some great points. We kind of all knew this was coming. Ubisoft wants to please the gamers but wants to please the shareholders even more. And how do you do that? By making a game that is a cross between Gears, COD, and Battlefield.: 3 of the most successful franchises in the industry. I'm kind of torn, I do like some elements of GRFS but I hate others. I am however looking forward to co-op and campaign or just playing with my core friends and relaxing. And to me that's worth every penny!


Co-op and campaign are good, but adversarial multiplayer is what GR has always been about to me. Come Borderlands 2 I will have all the co-op fun I can imagine(i am probably going to by that for both my 360 and my ps3). Most of my core GR buddies are not getting FS because they hate what it has become and that hurts co-op and vs. multiplayer for me. I am still torn though. I want to see the silver lining, but the cloud is just so darn big.

#10 got2b408

got2b408

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:41 PM

wish it was more like gr2

#11 ArmyRanger6

ArmyRanger6

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:26 PM

Ok, i never played ghost recon before yesterday and i gotta say, i wish i had started with GR instead of Cod. its SOOO much more enjoyable. all the features, graphics, sounds just everything makes me enjoy it. Cod is fun but this actually feels like a serious objective based game. all they gotta do is fix a couple glitches(invisible gun on spawn -_-) and id say its about perfect

thoughts?



If you played the past GR games you would be disappointed with GRFS; this game is more COD/GOW than GR, a big let down by Ubi.

Pick up GRAW 2 at Gamestop; they sell it for $5.99 in the bargain bin and a great game to play.

Edited by ArmyRanger6, 24 April 2012 - 01:02 PM.


#12 ITI SERPICO IVI

ITI SERPICO IVI

    Recruit - 2nd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 54 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canal Winchester, OH

Posted 24 April 2012 - 01:15 PM

What would make this game more tolerable for me would be to 1. turn off regenerative health 2. one hit one kill. 3. tone down intel. 4. offer last man standing. 5. even out the firepower. JUST GIVE US OPTIONS ON HOW WE WANT TO PLAY THE GAME.

Edited by ITI SERPICO IVI, 24 April 2012 - 01:24 PM.

Posted Image

#13 OSPerry

OSPerry

    Recruit - 2nd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 70 posts

Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:56 PM

I played Ghost Recon when it launched on Xbox LIVE (When Xbox LIVE launced back in 2002, I think) I loved GR and GRIT
Our clan played regularly almost every evening, and we had clan matches a couple of nights a weeks. With each release of GR after Ghost Recon Island Thunder (GRIT)
Ubisoft has continued to water down the original Tom Clancy Ghost Recon formula, to where it is now unrecognizable in most respects to what I loved in a game.

I'd love Ubisoft to do an HD remake with a new engine of the original GR and GRIT.

This game does push teamwork, but the game mechanics of it being in 3rd person, being able to look around a corner and seeing fully around it without exposing any part of your body...? And other issues.

When we played GR back in the day it was Team Siege with no respawns, and it was slow and methodical. I wish they would have an option for Team Siege in this new title, with no respawns, and force a First Person view, with lean and peak...

I can't believe the day has arrived where I won't be eagerly anticipating a Ghost Recon release, and even preordering it. Sad days. I hope reviews and further play of the demo/beta change my mind... but I doubt it.

-OS Perry
Old School Clan
Posted Image

#14 Lenney

Lenney

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Missouri

Posted 24 April 2012 - 08:05 PM

I played Ghost Recon when it launched on Xbox LIVE (When Xbox LIVE launced back in 2002, I think) I loved GR and GRIT
Our clan played regularly almost every evening, and we had clan matches a couple of nights a weeks. With each release of GR after Ghost Recon Island Thunder (GRIT)
Ubisoft has continued to water down the original Tom Clancy Ghost Recon formula, to where it is now unrecognizable in most respects to what I loved in a game.

I'd love Ubisoft to do an HD remake with a new engine of the original GR and GRIT.

This game does push teamwork, but the game mechanics of it being in 3rd person, being able to look around a corner and seeing fully around it without exposing any part of your body...? And other issues.

When we played GR back in the day it was Team Siege with no respawns, and it was slow and methodical. I wish they would have an option for Team Siege in this new title, with no respawns, and force a First Person view, with lean and peak...

I can't believe the day has arrived where I won't be eagerly anticipating a Ghost Recon release, and even preordering it. Sad days. I hope reviews and further play of the demo/beta change my mind... but I doubt it.

-OS Perry
Old School Clan

I agree 100% Perry. You may even remember me from GR:IT. I used to play with your clan a lot. Those were good times. In fact, you guys were some of the first friends I made on Xbox Live. I was kinda hoping to reconnect with some of my old friends on GR:FS, but clearly I won't be since I just can't stand the game. lol

Edited by Lenney, 24 April 2012 - 08:07 PM.

Posted Image

#15 Osok

Osok

    Recruit - 3rd Class

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 49 posts

Posted 25 April 2012 - 02:25 PM

I played Ghost Recon when it launched on Xbox LIVE (When Xbox LIVE launced back in 2002, I think) I loved GR and GRIT
Our clan played regularly almost every evening, and we had clan matches a couple of nights a weeks. With each release of GR after Ghost Recon Island Thunder (GRIT)
Ubisoft has continued to water down the original Tom Clancy Ghost Recon formula, to where it is now unrecognizable in most respects to what I loved in a game.

I'd love Ubisoft to do an HD remake with a new engine of the original GR and GRIT.

This game does push teamwork, but the game mechanics of it being in 3rd person, being able to look around a corner and seeing fully around it without exposing any part of your body...? And other issues.

When we played GR back in the day it was Team Siege with no respawns, and it was slow and methodical. I wish they would have an option for Team Siege in this new title, with no respawns, and force a First Person view, with lean and peak...

I can't believe the day has arrived where I won't be eagerly anticipating a Ghost Recon release, and even preordering it. Sad days. I hope reviews and further play of the demo/beta change my mind... but I doubt it.

-OS Perry
Old School Clan


This is what boggles my mind. The core support for this franchise are all players that have this memory. But UBI goes and has them build another COD wanna be. Why..oh why does this need to happen? There's too many run/gun shooters out there. Can't they stay true to the title history. Big maps, tactical, slow paced. They dont seem to understand there's a horde of folks out there that still crave this gameplay.

The telltale sign in all of this was that they release the beta with conflict and sabotage (two cod game mode ripoffs). Why? Of course to lure in the ADD generation of cod players and push to that market.

I've said endless times...take OGR and just update it graphically, mechanically etc. Leave the core game intact and add something like gunsmith to it and millions would be ecstatic! Same goes for a game like sniper elite. That first version on original xbox was stellar. The MP was perfect. What happened with that title? The idiot developers went and took out all advesarial MP in that game. Now it's junk! Developers forget IF IT AIN"T BROKE DONT FIX IT! Everyone wants a greedy piece of the COD pie unfortunately.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users