Jump to content

Ghost Recon Future Soldier


Photo

History of Tom Clancy Games


1 reply to this topic

#1 CR6

CR6

     

  • Consultant
  • 3,230 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 January 2012 - 09:43 AM

Worth a read. Nice to hear from Brian Upton again :thumbsup:

http://games.ign.com.../1216302p1.html

#2 Rocky

Rocky

     

  • Admin
  • 22,662 posts
  • XFire:rocky00grnet
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bonnie Scotland

Posted 18 January 2012 - 12:13 PM

Nice one. There's a similar roundup in a post JognTC02 made the other day.

Reading the comments, as always with these type of articles, you'll always find at least one, concise and valid point of view...

The Tom Clancy franchises are all soulless shadows of their former selves. Ubisoft has sacrificed the very gameplay that made the games popular in the first place to appeal to the COD crowd. Gone are the days of tactical freedom in sandbox environments. Gone are the realistic and tense missions where intelligence was more important than your itchy trigger finger.

In essence, they've probably done the best thing for their business and trying to market these shooters to as wide of an audience as possible...but is it worth it? Not to me.

DanHibikiFan

Posted Image
GhostRecon.net | Rainbow Six | PSP Guides | Support GR.net | My Blog | My Game Videos
Posted Image

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Albert Einstein
 

"Framerate is just a number" WatchDogs Creative Director
 

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users