I'm curious as to what do the A-Teams use for their heavy firepower? I dont think they use the M60/Mk48 like the SEAL's, at least I've never seen it, so what do they pack? The stock 240B seems a bit cumbersome for their operations (I've only seen them mounted on vehicles), but maybe there's a compact version I dont know of? Or does SF just stick with the SAW's?
Page 1 of 1
What medium/heavy MG do Special Forces use? Besides the M249/Mk46...
#3
Posted 24 October 2004 - 08:20 PM
they have available to them: mk43 (m60), mk 46 (minimi), mk48 (fn mag) what they use is up the the operator probably
#4
Posted 24 October 2004 - 08:58 PM
supasniper, on Oct 24 2004, 08:20 PM, said:
Hmm...I thought the M60E4 was the Mk48. Whatever, I've never seen that weapon, before, but yeah, that's a compact 240, just as I thought they would probably use. I probably have seen them carrying it, it just looks so similar to the Mk46 I couldnt tell.
I want a muffin.
#5
Posted 24 October 2004 - 10:42 PM
there's alomst no difference between the mk46 & 48 other then size untill you get close and really start comparing them.
the SEALs might still have some stoner LMG's in their armoury left over from 'nam too
the SEALs might still have some stoner LMG's in their armoury left over from 'nam too
#8
Posted 25 October 2004 - 02:39 AM
I saw on the FN website that the Mk46 and 48 are two different guns:
FN-MAG (M240B or GPMG) all variations of the same 7.62 'light' machine gun.
Minimi (M249, C9, etc) this is the newer, smaller 5.56 'version' of the MAG. It actually has the same action but looks so different and is sued so widely it has spawned a class of its own including;
Minimi para ( very short barrel and a sliding stock)
MK46 Mod-0 (the seals like it - fixed stock I think and shorter barrel - rail system added)
Which brings us to the MK48 Mod-0 (a 7.62 version of the M249 to look at, with the same rail system as the MK46; this can be considered perhaps a shorter version of the M240B)
So:
M240B - long 7.62
M249 - rifle-length 5.56
MK48 - rifle length 7.62
MK46 - shorter M249 5.56
...I guess...
FN-MAG (M240B or GPMG) all variations of the same 7.62 'light' machine gun.
Minimi (M249, C9, etc) this is the newer, smaller 5.56 'version' of the MAG. It actually has the same action but looks so different and is sued so widely it has spawned a class of its own including;
Minimi para ( very short barrel and a sliding stock)
MK46 Mod-0 (the seals like it - fixed stock I think and shorter barrel - rail system added)
Which brings us to the MK48 Mod-0 (a 7.62 version of the M249 to look at, with the same rail system as the MK46; this can be considered perhaps a shorter version of the M240B)
So:
M240B - long 7.62
M249 - rifle-length 5.56
MK48 - rifle length 7.62
MK46 - shorter M249 5.56
...I guess...
Let me put it to you bluntly. In a changing world, we want more people to have control over your own life." �G
George W. Bush �X Annandale, Va, Aug. 9, 2004.
George W. Bush �X Annandale, Va, Aug. 9, 2004.
#9
Posted 16 December 2004 - 08:45 PM
It depends on the group in question. Rangers are known to use M2's every once in a while, though it's not their preferred weapon.
Keep in mind that Spec Ops groups try as hard as possible to avoid enemy contact unless they're on a dedicated search-and-destroy mission, so the average team might have a couple 249's or 240G's, maybe a 60 in some cases. Other groups, like the SAS, use adapted AR's in the support role. These have heavier barrels, bipods, etc.
Again, the spec ops community doesn't usually carry HMG's because they shouldn't have the need for them. Those are for sustained firefights, and that's the last thing a team of 8 needs!
Keep in mind that Spec Ops groups try as hard as possible to avoid enemy contact unless they're on a dedicated search-and-destroy mission, so the average team might have a couple 249's or 240G's, maybe a 60 in some cases. Other groups, like the SAS, use adapted AR's in the support role. These have heavier barrels, bipods, etc.
Again, the spec ops community doesn't usually carry HMG's because they shouldn't have the need for them. Those are for sustained firefights, and that's the last thing a team of 8 needs!
The job of the infantry may be to close with the enemy, but a sniper lets his bullets do the closing for him.
Confuscious said "do not use a hatchet to remove a fly from a friend's forehead". He never said anything about using a 7.62 to remove the fly from a tango's head, did he?
Confuscious said "do not use a hatchet to remove a fly from a friend's forehead". He never said anything about using a 7.62 to remove the fly from a tango's head, did he?
#10
Posted 16 December 2004 - 09:33 PM
RooK, on Oct 24 2004, 06:23 PM, said:
Did someone say Stoner 63???

Quote
There are some things my Tribe is not good at at all. My Tribe doesn't make excuses. My Tribe will analyze failure and assign blame, but that is to make sure that we do better next time, and we never, ever waste valuable energy and time doing so while people are still in danger. My Tribe says, and in their heart completely believes that it's the other guy that's the hero. My Tribe does not believe that a single Man can cause, prevent or steer Hurricanes, and my Tribe does not and has never made someone else responsible for their own safety, and that of their loved ones. - Bill Whittle
#11
Posted 17 December 2004 - 10:04 PM
as the stoner 63 was replaced by stoner's "other" design- the m16/ar-15 colt family of weapons- the military - contrary to standard "mothball" procedures-actually snatched them up and destroyed many of them; making them a very sought after collector's peice. there are very few surviving stoner 63's today, nearly all in private hands. For the units or operators who are using them today typically use the Robinson m96 modular system, which can be a recon carbine, lmg, or bren gun style top-feeding lmg.
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote



