Rtheman

Hi guys, I've been reading as much as i possibly can about GRFS over the last few months...and now if i'm honest. I'm completely gutted. I'm not a halo fan, i'm not a COD fan. I like BF3 and a few others but honestly I like my shooters a certain way. And one of the last greats that i played was GRAW2. Fantastic game, campaign wise i couldn't get enough of it. Played it multiple times and still playing it now because i liked it that much. I loved the way GRFS looked at E3 2010, the whole look of the ghosts, the weapons, the technology, the way even that level looked. Everything about it reeked of amazing. Then the damn developers decided to change it all. Now i know there are going to be people on here giving me the same age old argument that always gets dumped around, 'its the devs game and if they choose to change it then thats their choice', but honestly I think they've taken what was a amazing looking concept, and made it look faintly average. They've put arguments up saying that 'when you focus too much on Sci Fi in a Sci Fi universe then you end up being just a standard Grunt and it takes away the elite feel'??? Thats absolute rubbish, i watched that gameplay footage from 2010 probably over 60 times and not once did i think that the enemies were in anyway as advanced or well trained as the ghosts were meant to be. The ghosts looked amazing, their setup looked fantastic and their armour looked the absolute business, and that assault rifle as well...wow. Now they've got stupid looking face covers on that hide the space between their chin and neck. Sounds like a very specific gripe i know, but no1 wants to spend money on a character that looks ridiculous?? In summary, i think they've ruined what could've been a really amazing game and made it what looks like a slight revamp of GRAW2 now. They've added a few mechanics and tech and fine tuned it a little bit. But their unwillingness to travel a little farther into the future than they have has stumped the game for me. And most, if not all, of the followers of it that i know of. PLEASE REMEMBER THIS IS MY OPINION SO PLEASE DONT BOTHER REPLYING IF YOU'VE JUST GOT THE SAME OLD ARGUMENTS TO THROW IN What are your guys thoughts?

I really bloody hope so, i'm just so sick and tired of 'console exclusives', its happening with so many games, including skyrim, a game i've been killing for, microsoft swooped in and secured exclusive DLC for it?? why?? There is no need, it doesn't make me want an XBOX anymore? It makes me really hate microsoft, makes them look like selfish bloody children instead of a large developed company. Ridiculous. I know this sounds stupid but if Future Soldier releases without Gunsmith on the PS3 then i probably won't buy, because im just fed up with being penalised for the console i own. A console with equal or superior (fact please don't argue it) hardware and the ability to play games just as well or better than its competitors, not my fault that companies this large can't be bothered to get to grips with programming on anything outside of microsofts white box. Sorry for the rant, just does my head in.

Hi guys, Does anyone know whether or not the gunsmith is available in the PS3 version? I don't mean via the camera i mean for just controller use even, it wouldn't be even slightly challenging for them to make it and it will actually be a real killer for GR if they don't bother to put a feature as awesome as that in the PS3 version. I am starting to get ridiculously sick and tired of all this console rivalry now, and i mean much higher up that the people that own them. Console exclusives should be a thing of the past now, and i honestly think as do many people i know and have spoken to online that if the PS3 is missing the ability to customise weapons as well as the 360 just because of kinect then it will put a lot of people off buying it. And it doesn't make people want to buy a 360. It makes people dislike it who don't own it. But sorry for the rant if anyone could shed any light that would be fantastic. Cheers