Jump to content
Ghost Recon.net Forums

Snake@War

GR.net Supporter
  • Content count

    1,508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Snake@War


  1. Well I just bought a new lappy, Zeealex. I guess it's not a reinstall. :P First install on this machine.

    Yes. I really like what I see. I was wondering if this was going to ever happen, decided to check, and was very surprised to find this project.

    I never used to play very much online, but enjoyed it when I did. I need to find a few good servers and get involved.


  2. Thing is I cant blame anyone not realising this and that would be quite smug to say so. Although in recent times im rather surprised at how many still don't ask. That for me is the dangerous "bit".

    That is what I was referring to. The fact that despite what is CURRENTLY going on, people still refuse to ask questions.

    @NoQuarter: Well a lot of the time if you DO try to break incredible stories that don't sound possible, you risk your journalistic career (even if they are true). There is a serious risk of being excommunicated by the journalistic community if you don't play your cards the way they want you too. That means that some times you have to hold onto that ace even though want to play it. I doubt many reporters during WWII were talking about all the "invalids" that were being castrated in the US thanks to social darwinism. But guess what? It was happening.


  3. ^

    Perhaps when you included "scary" and "sinister" within the same narrative on these news commentators and their ratings and/or power that that famous English wit -or was that sarcasm?- of yours was lost in translation...again? That must be it.

    Your move, DS.

    That was incredible response to his excellent point....

    As far as I'm concerned, the ball's still in your side of the court, No1/4.

    In a Lincoln-Douglas debate your response would be considered forfeiture on that point... just saying.

    I also think that the way the news media in the US is run is very dangerous. The White House has MOST of the networks in its pocket, and the public, in general, don't ask any questions of these networks. Fanboyism over networks(any news network) is a dangerous game, especially when they are being censored from high up.

    Edit: After rereading my post I want to state that there was absolutely no malfeasance intended. :) We're all friends here. :D


  4. I'm trying to figure how the third person view will work. If it's an individual option or server option. You'd think it would be server setting. It would make it easier to detect people sneaking up behind you unfortunately.

    If you read the article I linked to, :P you would see that it is a server side option... Well technically it is a playlist, like hardcore, old school, or standard games.

    I was talking about the type of 3rd person camera. I am concerned. Will it be like the GRAW camera or more like Socom? In Socom it's WAY too easy to do the whole look around corners without really looking.

    I sure hope your informant has reliable information. That would justify my purchase of the game.

    :)

    Also, could someone post a translation of the intro to the mission?

    I have a better link to the video in the first post.

    Snake, out.


  5. This post is concerned with a leaked SP video that is beginning to cause outrage in the community. There are spoilers in the video that show off one of the SP missions designed to be emotionally stirring and.... well you'll find out.

    Outrageous MW2 video. I can't wait to see the flak they get for this in the press.... Yeah.

    Oh BTW...

    Kotaku says that Third Person Camera Is No Rumor.

    I'm actually not upset about that. To be honest, if it's done right, I think it could be pretty cool. That's a big if though. It gives you better situational/peripheral awareness, plus it lets you watch the awesome animations. I actually tend to wait a while after a round starts so I get to watch my team mates sprint, occasionally. Now, IF I do eventually get the game, I won't have to. :)

    I just hope they add SADS.

    Edit:

    New link to a better video.


  6. I found and online CDKey store offering Arma2 for 14.99

    I just bought CoD4 and CoD5 this way. I got them BOTH for 13.50. You just have to know someone who has the game disks you can borrow, or aquire the disks via different methods.

    I would avoid places that you don't know that you can trust, though. Just do a search and see what people say about the e-tailer before you buy.


  7. Yeah... It's just cheeky.

    No mods, no 24/7 clan/community owned SADSs, no control over who joins the SADS you pay for... Communities that kick over language, ping, exploits, abuse, racism and all that jazz can't say no to these abusers. P2P hosting sucks. Try playing COD4 on a console. I own CoD4 on PS3 and PC so I know from experience that I prefer a master list over matchmaking. While I will admit that the matchmaking is not a terrible idea (sometimes it's nice to just start CoD4 on my PS3 and join a random HC-TDM), there should still be support for dedis. Period.

    No SADS is no good thing.

    BTW: VAC isn't a great anti-cheat if you didn't know. At least in my experience.

×