Jump to content
Ghost Recon.net Forums


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Papa6 last won the day on December 16 2016

Papa6 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

88 Excellent

About Papa6

  • Rank
    Ghost - 1st Class
  • Birthday 24/07/1968

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Reno, Nevada

Recent Profile Visitors

13,260 profile views
  1. Papa6

    Open Beta Announced

    For what its worth. I like the game. Is it Ghost Recon? -no. But for what it's worth, I will get this game and enjoy it for whatever replay I can get out of it. I'm playing Sniper Elite 4 and it was designed as a 3rd person view game from the start. So I'm accustomed to it now.
  2. What I have seen of UBISOFT of late is their 3rd person view Ghost recon Future Soldier, The Division and now Wildlands all use the same exact viewing perspective, gamestyle and openworlds(Division and Wildlands) I'll have to be impressed to get this one. But I will see what the reviews say. Kinda sad when you own 3 games with the same exact style of game play in basic design.
  3. I'll probably wait to see what the reviews are first. I have bought too many drink coasters.
  4. I'm sure the days of modding are gone. Modding was hip back in the early 2000's. GR 1. But developers saw that the mod community was just as good if not better than the devs themselves. So they create games that cannot be modded so you buy DLC. DLC may add some little time to a game but it does get old because most games have no replayability.
  5. I'd like 1st person view. 3rd person is a bit old. 1st person gives the impression of one actually playing the game.
  6. I'm in the midst of creating a mission, simple now, one village but will expand it to a campaign. situation: I have a survivor I found under the enemy section in Eden Editor. I want the mission to give the player/team a win in SP/MP modes when this general gets killed. He's the objective to winning the mission. anyone know the syntax on how to accomplish this? -papa6
  7. in relation to Wildlands, from reviews of what I've seen pre-release and release, UBISOFT downgrades everything. I have a video to submit as evidence to show what you see in the trailers is hype and will be changed for the worst. in video , all settings are set to high to ensure the best graphics possible. I'll venture to say Wildlands will get the same treatment. so be careful in the way you see UBISOFT games in general because they alway polish the pre-release trailers then downshift for the final release. -Papa6 Published on Jun 4, 2016Comparison between E3 demos and retail version of recent Ubisoft games. I encourage you to not only focus on textures or lighting, but also on animation, level design, assets, physics, and sound. Recorded in 1080p at max settings on PC with a controller. Enable annotations if you don't know which footage is E3 or retail. Watch dogs 0:26 - The Division 2:33 - Rainbow Six Siege 5:58 - Far Cry 4 9:47 - Far Cry 3 12:20 second video link: Here
  8. NSFW, some language*** But this guy gives a review of the current state of the game 6 months out and acknowledges the time left to polish the game but explains some of what i have mentioned about the game engine being reused and dumbed down. I'm not getting excited about this title at all and shows in game footage issues and covers why the game thus far is being totaly "hyped" when we should be asking, this is what they came up with so close to release. He gives conjecture to this game going gold about December possible if the release is March 2017. to me all the in game footage reminds me of the mechanics of "the division" and splintercell combined. But all the footage is from in game (June 14th) hopefully this hasn't been posted yet. forgive me if it has. peace out, Papa6
  9. The "use your face in game" thing has been played out. Vegas 2 even had it. if they want credibility for this title, they need to return to the old days. use a predesignated set of ghosts. he'll attribute up as he completes missions like OGR. Still sitting back to watch peoples reactions after it hits the streets. I've come to realize that, Ubisoft doesn't put out demos anymore.. just videos of in game play which are scripted heavily.
  10. maybe closed betas. but I haven't seen any demos for most of my ubisoft collection.
  11. I was reading some posts and a thought popped into my head. "What is seriously lacking" and a huge problem that has allowed UBISOFT to skirt the real issue of "what are we going to get is.. no Demo. Games used to be intro'd with a Demo. UBISOFT though endeavors to hide its hand by offering no demo so players know what their getting.. I mean.. who the heck buys a car without a test drive? I think this is a tactic UBISOFT has managed to conceal for a long time. most developers try to use fancy videos with cinematic footage to woo players. But to get a real demo is a dead animal. no developer or publisher can justify selling a game without a user getting a test run on a dumbed down version to at least see what the mechanics and gameplay are like. The Division was just a primer to get the game engine into GR:W.
  12. TO be honest, looking at the in game play, it looks like a cookie cutter of the division. the over the shoulder viewpoint, the movement system, Ubisoft has really entrenched itself as a over the shoulder (OTS) system for most of their games now. it started with GR:FS.. which moved into the GR: online .. which moved into The division.. now this. they essentially took the vantage point of Sam Fisher of the Splintercell series and mashed it into the GR franchise which now 3 franchises all look and feel EXACTLY the same in play, feel and movements. they slapped some textures of guys with beards.. which is true of modern day black ops/spec ops members. I just don't believe in it to this point. I watched the video carefully.. VERY carefully.. some things may function differently in wildlands but the exact same game build style OTS is being presented just in a new package(Game). added later: as for the editions.. wow, where do I start? it takes you away from the game. how many games have people bought, with all these additions, the extreme edition with all the trinkets (just junk). it a marketing ploy folks. they sell the game as the base but bump the cost of the game by adding some map, a cheap headset.. the soundtrack. how about the game? ok.. get the most expensive edition.. open it up and lay it all out on your table when you get it. now imagine your table minus all the stuff outside of the DVD or Digital download.. you just have trinkets you spent 60 quid or up to 90 quid just to get the game and some junk. the tangibles I guess is what I'm saying. then you pay extra to get better firearms? they did this with GR:FS and GR:Online. now they make this huge freaking map and it just plays on what you probably have already.. the division...GR:FS.. and the splinter cell series. sorry for the rant.... but I just wanted to warn people about what is really going on. watch your wallets folks. I hate to see people get duped..again
  13. here's the official website Squad looks to be the new replacement to GR it's in early access for $39.99 on steam.
  14. Papa6

    Windows 10 update- older games

    I've made a conscious decision that before I consider to honestly upgrade to Windows 10, would be AFTER this summers anniversary build release ( aptly named redstone 1) and when about 80% of the promised features that MS has promised to go into 10 are in and stable.
  15. Papa6

    Windows 10 update- older games

    so this leads me to believe that Microsoft wants to be in control of apps in the UWP arena. This leads me also to believe MS is in a hostile bid to take over all gaming from all developers/publishers. Some say its not true or possible some think so, (EPIC game dev). however at any rate, I'll keep an eye on this